Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 610.02 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1963 c 753 art 2 s 17]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1945–1950 · leading case: State v. Cantrell, 18 N.W.2d 681 (Minn. 1945).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

State v. Cantrell, 18 N.W.2d 681 (Minn. 1945). · cites it 3× “) Section 610.02 (§ 9907), a section of the chapter entitled “General Provisions Relating to Crimes,” provides: “(1) * * * the words ‘neglect,’ ‘negligence,’ ‘negligent,’ and ‘negligently’ shall import a want of such attention to the nature or probable consequences of the act or…”

State v. Schaub, 44 N.W.2d 61 (Minn. 1950). “As used in our criminal statutes, the words “neglect,” “negligence,” “negligent,” and “negligently” are defined in § 610.02 as “a want of such attention to the nature or probable consequences *517 of the act or omission as an ordinarily prudent man usually exercises in his own…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.