Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 610.21 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1963 c 753 art 2 s 17]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1945–1967 · leading case: State v. Johnson, 141 N.W.2d 517 (Minn. 1966).
State v. Johnson, 141 N.W.2d 517 (Minn. 1966). “The purpose and policy expressed by the statute as revised have roots in early legislative enactments and decisions of this court.”
State v. Thompson, 62 N.W.2d 512 (Minn. 1954). “We have not failed to consider § 610.21 which provides: "Any act or omission declared criminal and punishable in different ways by different provisions of law shall be punished under only one of such provisions, and a conviction or acquittal under any one shall bar a prosecution…”
City of Bloomington v. Kossow, 131 N.W.2d 206 (Minn. 1964). “035 of the Criminal Codfe of 1963 was adopted as a replacement of our former § 610.21. The new provision reads: “Except as provided in section 609.”
State ex rel. MacMillen v. Utecht, 21 N.W.2d 239 (Minn. 1945). “Petitioner further asserts that his second sentence violated § 610.21 (§ 9924), which provides: “Any act or omission declared criminal and punishable in different ways by different provisions of law shall be punished under only one of such provisions, and a conviction or…”
State ex rel. Boswell v. Tahash, 154 N.W.2d 813 (Minn. 1967). “1957, § 610.21, now superseded but in force at the time of the convictions, provided: “Any act or omission declared criminal and punishable in different ways by different provisions of law shall be punished under only one of such provisions, and a conviction or acquittal under…”
State ex rel. Koalska v. Swenson, 66 N.W.2d 337 (Minn. 1954). “17 in connection with §§ 622.06 and 610.28. Section 610.17 provides that: “The minimum penalty of imprisonment for any felony committed within this state shall be one year if the court, in its discretion, shall impose a state’s prison or reformatory sentence therefor; * * It is…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.