Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 616.01 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1963 c 753 art 2 s 17]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1943–1965 · leading case: Randall v. Vill. of Excelsior, 103 N.W.2d 131 (Minn. 1960).
Randall v. Vill. of Excelsior, 103 N.W.2d 131 (Minn. 1960). · cites it 2× “” Section 616.01 provides: “A public nuisance is a crime against the order and economy of the state and consists in unlawfully doing an act or omitting to perform a duty, which act or omission shall: “(1) Annoy, injure, or endanger the safety, health, comfort, or repose of any…”
State v. Red Owl Stores, Inc., 92 N.W.2d 103 (Minn. 1958). · cites it 4× “They fall into two categories which are clearly distinguishable from the instant case: (1) Instances where the statutes specifically provided for injunctive relief in lieu of a criminal prosecution [21] and (2) cases upholding injunctions because no specific statutory…”
Dart v. Pure Oil Co., 27 N.W.2d 555 (Minn. 1947). · cites it 2× “1945, § 616.01. 3 In those cases the court determined that the negligent acts constituted a nuisance and were wilful and intentional.”
Kelsey v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. R.R., 117 N.W.2d 559 (Minn. 1962). · cites it 3× “Upon plaintiff’s motion, the trial court granted a new trial, acknowledging that “an error of law was committed by the court in failing to instruct the jury with respect to the applicability of Section 616.01, M. S. A., as requested by plaintiff’s counsel” and, in further…”
Greenwood v. Evergreen Mines Co., 19 N.W.2d 726 (Minn. 1945). · cites it 2× “” But the grant of such power is subject to the statutory requirements and limitations stated in §§ 616.01 and 616.02 (§§ 10241 and 10245).”
Dornack v. Barton Constr. Co., 137 N.W.2d 536 (Minn. 1965). “1961, §§ 616.01 and 616.02, even though done negligently.”
Shepstedt v. Hayes, 21 N.W.2d 199 (Minn. 1945). “1941, § 616.01 (Mason St. 1927, § 10241). See, McCartney v.”
Kelsey v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. R.R., 114 N.W.2d 90 (Minn. 1962). · cites it 2× “The only direct reference in the order to the basis for the trial court’s decision is contained in the following language: “* * * and the court being of the view that an error of law was committed by the court in failing to instruct the jury with respect to the applicability of…”
State v. Sportsmen's Country Club, 7 N.W.2d 495 (Minn. 1943). “1941, § 616.01 (Mason St. 1927, § 10241), could be sustained here because of the lack of any evidence of disorderly conduct.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.