Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 618.02 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1971 c 937 s 22]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases, 1967–2000 · leading case: In Re Welfare of C.R.M., 611 N.W.2d 802 (Minn. 2000).
In Re Welfare of C.R.M., 611 N.W.2d 802 (Minn. 2000). “While we have not yet ruled whether under this statute a chapter 609 offense must be interpreted as a strict liability crime where it contains no language indicating intent or knowledge, in several opinions we have ruled on whether mere "possession" in various contexts requires…”
State v. Siirila, 193 N.W.2d 467 (Minn. 1971). “Section 618.02 reads: "Except as authorized by this chapter it shall be unlawful for any person to sell, prescribe, administer, dispense or *469 furnish to a minor, or manufacture, possess, have under his control, sell, prescribe, administer, dispense, or compound any narcotic…”
State v. Grilli, 230 N.W.2d 445 (Minn. 1975). “1969, § 618.02, a felony for which defendant received a sentence of 5 to 20 years.”
State v. Purdy, 153 N.W.2d 254 (Minn. 1967). “When all of this information is considered together, it becomes clear that Detective Wilson had ample cause to believe that defendant was violating § 618.02. In addition, Detective Wilson informed Ramsey County Deputy Sheriff Humphrey of these facts before the arrest occurred.”
State v. Maki, 192 N.W.2d 811 (Minn. 1971). “1969, §§ 618.02 and 152.09. The state contends here that the municipal court misconceived its role as a magistrate in preliminary examination and functioned as a trier of fact in determining guilt or innocence rather than passing upon the issue of whether the *428 evidence…”
State v. Gannaway, 191 N.W.2d 555 (Minn. 1971). “1969, § 618.02. The seized articles consisted of a plastic bag containing marijuana and a corncob pipe, the bowl of which contained a residue of marijuana.”
State v. Linder, 190 N.W.2d 91 (Minn. 1971). “937, § 13, *218 and § 618.02 was repealed by c. 937, § 22). After the defendant entered a plea of not guilty, the state served notice of the seizure of evidence and a Rasmussen hearing was held.”
State v. Dill, 151 N.W.2d 413 (Minn. 1967). “Section 618.02 provides: “Except as authorized by this chapter it shall be unlawful for any person to sell, prescribe, administer, dispense or furnish to a minor, or manufacture, possess, have under his control, sell, prescribe, administer, dispense, or compound any narcotic…”
State v. Resnick, 177 N.W.2d 418 (Minn. 1970). “The principal contention of the appellant is that the evidence in the record to be reviewed was inadequate to justify a finding that defendant violated the proscription of § 618.02. We agree with the claim of appellant and the judgment of conviction is reversed.”
State v. Morgan, 178 N.W.2d 697 (Minn. 1970). “The question posed is whether a person can be convicted of violating § 618.02 when found in possession of a quantity of marijuana so minimal in amount as to be unusable.”
State v. Morgan, 178 N.W.2d 697 (Minn. 1970). “The question posed is whether a person can be convicted of violating § 618.02 when found in possession of a quantity of marijuana so minimal in amount as to be unusable.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.