Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 618. UNIFORM NARCOTIC DRUG ACT
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 618.18 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1971 c 937 s 22]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1961–1987 · leading case: McLaughlin v. State, 190 N.W.2d 867 (Minn. 1971).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
McLaughlin v. State, 190 N.W.2d 867 (Minn. 1971). · cites it 3× “1969, § 618.18, relating to the forgery of drug prescriptions.”
Marriage of Eckman v. Eckman, 410 N.W.2d 385 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 2× “DECISION The evidence supports the trial court’s findings regarding custody modification pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 618.18(d). The trial court therefore did not abuse its discretion by granting respondent’s motion to change custody where 16-year-old son expressed a preference to…”
State ex rel. McGregor v. Rigg, 109 N.W.2d 310 (Minn. 1961). · cites it 5× “Relator’s contention that § 618.18 is unconstitutional because of its subtitle or headnote — “Restrictions on Obtaining Drugs” —is without merit.”
DeGidio v. State, 200 N.W.2d 898 (Minn. 1972). “1969, § 618.18, and was sentenced to the custody of the YCC for the maximum indeterminate term of 20 years.”
Minn. Stat. § 618.18(d): 1 case
Marriage of Eckman v. Eckman, 410 N.W.2d 385 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). “DECISION The evidence supports the trial court’s findings regarding custody modification pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 618.18(d). The trial court therefore did not abuse its discretion by granting respondent’s motion to change custody where 16-year-old son expressed a preference to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.