Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 62. ACCIDENT AND HEALTH INSURANCE
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 62.03 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1957 c 489 s 11]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1955–1962 · leading case: O'DONNELL v. Cont'l Cas. Co., 116 N.W.2d 680 (Minn. 1962).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
O'DONNELL v. Cont'l Cas. Co., 116 N.W.2d 680 (Minn. 1962). · cites it 10× “1953, § 62.03, which reads: "Every policy so issued shall contain certain standard provisions, which shall be in the words and in the order hereinafter set forth and be preceded in every policy by the caption `Standard Provision.”
Wright v. Mut. Benefit Health & Accident Assn., 81 N.W.2d 610 (Minn. 1957). · cites it 3× “” The insurance policy involved in this case contains certain provisions, as required by M. S. A. 62.03(7), providing that the insured must furnish proof of loss to the insurer within 90 days after the termination of the period for which the insurer is liable.”
Lucas v. Sun Life Assurance Co., 136 F. Supp. 265 (D. Minn. 1955). · cites it 2× “§ 62.03-(5)5 gives rise to a factual issue as to the reasonableness of the impossibility to give timely notice and the reasonableness of the notice given.”
Minn. Stat. § 62.03(10): 1 case
Wright v. Mut. Benefit Health & Accident Assn., 81 N.W.2d 610 (Minn. 1957). “” The insurance policy involved in this case contains certain provisions, as required by M. S. A. 62.03(7), providing that the insured must furnish proof of loss to the insurer within 90 days after the termination of the period for which the insurer is liable.”
Minn. Stat. § 62.03(5): 1 case
Lucas v. Sun Life Assurance Co., 136 F. Supp. 265 (D. Minn. 1955). “§ 62.03-(5)5 gives rise to a factual issue as to the reasonableness of the impossibility to give timely notice and the reasonableness of the notice given.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.