Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 620.01 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1963 c 753 art 2 s 17]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1954–2000 · leading case: State v. Thompson, 62 N.W.2d 512 (Minn. 1954).
State v. Thompson, 62 N.W.2d 512 (Minn. 1954). “42 of county funds and of having omitted and refused to pay the same over to his successor on June 6, 1950 (pursuant to § 620.01[4]), he was indicted (under § 620.”
State v. Larson, 605 N.W.2d 706 (Minn. 2000). “town, who, [[Image here]] (4) Willfully omits or refuses to pay over to the state or its officer or agent authorized by law to receive the same, or to such city, village, borough, school district, county, or town, or the proper officer or authority empowered to demand and…”
State v. Funkhouser, 637 P.2d 974 (Wash. Ct. App. 1981). “See Minn. Stat. § 620.01 (repealed 1963); N.Y.”
— Minn. Stat. § 620.01(1) — 1 case
State v. Thompson, 62 N.W.2d 512 (Minn. 1954). “42 of county funds and of having omitted and refused to pay the same over to his successor on June 6, 1950 (pursuant to § 620.01[4]), he was indicted (under § 620.”
— Minn. Stat. § 620.01(4) — 1 case
State v. Thompson, 62 N.W.2d 512 (Minn. 1954). “42 of county funds and of having omitted and refused to pay the same over to his successor on June 6, 1950 (pursuant to § 620.01[4]), he was indicted (under § 620.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.