Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 631.52 (2026)

Effect Of Certain Convictions On Custody And Parenting Time Rights

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subdivision 1.Suspension of parenting time rights; transfer of custody.

(a) If a person who has court-ordered custody of a child or parenting time rights is convicted of a crime listed in subdivision 2 and if no action is pending regarding custody or parenting time, the sentencing court shall refer the matter to the appropriate family court for action under this section. The family court shall:

(1) grant temporary custody to the noncustodial parent, unless it finds that another custody arrangement is in the best interests of the child; or

(2) suspend parenting time rights, unless it finds that parenting time with the convicted person is in the best interests of the child.

The family court shall expedite proceedings under this section. The defendant has the burden of proving that continued custody or parenting time with the defendant is in the best interests of the child. If the victim of the crime was a family or household member as defined in section 518B.01, subdivision 2, the standard of proof is clear and convincing evidence. A guardian ad litem must be appointed in any case to which this section applies.

(b) If a person who has child custody or parenting time rights was convicted of a crime listed in subdivision 2 before July 1, 1990, then any interested party may petition the sentencing court for relief under paragraph (a) if:

(1) the defendant is currently incarcerated, on probation, or under supervised release for the offense; or

(2) the victim of the crime was a family or household member as defined in section 518B.01, subdivision 2.

Subd. 2.Application.

Subdivision 1 applies to the following crimes or similar crimes under the laws of the United States or any other state:

(1) murder in the first, second, or third degree under section 609.185, 609.19, or 609.195;

(2) manslaughter in the first degree under section 609.20;

(3) assault in the first, second, or third degree under section 609.221, 609.222, or 609.223;

(4) kidnapping under section 609.25;

(5) depriving another of custodial or parental rights under section 609.26;

(6) soliciting, inducing, promoting, or receiving profit derived from prostitution involving a minor under section 609.322;

(7) criminal sexual conduct in the first degree under section 609.342;

(8) criminal sexual conduct in the second degree under section 609.343;

(9) criminal sexual conduct in the third degree under section 609.344, subdivision 1, clause (a) or (c), or subdivision 1a, clause (f) to (h);

(10) solicitation of a child to engage in sexual conduct under section 609.352;

(11) incest under section 609.365;

(12) malicious punishment of a child under section 609.377;

(13) neglect of a child under section 609.378;

(14) terroristic threats under section 609.713;

(15) felony harassment or stalking under section 609.749; or

(16) domestic assault by strangulation under section 609.2247.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2015–2026 · leading case: In re the Custody of: A. A. S., Karryn Colleen Schwab v. Ryan George Schenck, ..., No. a250628 (Minn. Ct. App. Mar. 9, 2026).
In re the Custody of: A. A. S., Karryn Colleen Schwab v. Ryan George Schenck, ..., No. a250628 (Minn. Ct. App. Mar. 9, 2026). · cites it 4× “See Minn. Stat. §§ 631.52 (2024) (outlining effect of criminal convictions on custody and parenting time); 518.”
Thomas C. Rubey v. Valerie A. Vannett, No. A15-1728 (Minn. Ct. App. June 20, 2016). · cites it 2× “(b) Except as provided in section 631.52, the court may not restrict parenting time unless it finds that .”
In re the Marriage of: Todd Emil Nelson v. Leslie Ann Nelson, No. A15-323 (Minn. Ct. App. Dec. 21, 2015). · cites it 2× “5(b)(1)(2014) (“Except as provided in section 631.52, the court may not restrict parenting time unless it finds that .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.