Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 632.10 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1979 c 233 s 42]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13
cases, 1945–1972 · leading case: State v. King, 156 N.W.2d 742 (Minn. 1968).
State v. King, 156 N.W.2d 742 (Minn. 1968). “I), 1 coupled with a certification of questions pursuant to § 632.10. 2 On September 20, 1967, defendant, Robert Francis King, was in- *227 dieted for the crime of murder in the first degree on account of the death of Floyd Joseph Haley occurring at Rochester, Minnesota, on…”
State v. Suess, 52 N.W.2d 409 (Minn. 1952). “” The district court overruled the demurrers in both cases and, with the consent *176 of the state and the defendant in each case, certified to this court, pursuant to § 632.10, the questions involved as important and doubtful.”
State v. Lanesboro Produce & Hatchery Co., 21 N.W.2d 792 (Minn. 1946). “1941, § 632.10 (Mason St. 1927, § 10756), reported the case to this court for decision of the legal and constitutional questions involved and certified the following questions: “1.”
State v. Miller, 185 N.W.2d 872 (Minn. 1971). “On January 16, 1970, defendant, again appearing specially, requested that the court certify the following question to this court as important or doubtful within the meaning of § 632.10: "Is an arrest for a gross misdemeanor made in the presence of the arresting officer within…”
State v. Iosue, 19 N.W.2d 735 (Minn. 1945). “1941, § 632.10 (Mason St. 1927, § 10756). We shall consider and determine these in the order certified.”
State v. Cantrell, 18 N.W.2d 681 (Minn. 1945). “” The demurrer was overruled, but the court was of “opinion that certain questions of law have arisen which are so important and doubtful as to require the decision” of the supreme court; and, since defendant had requested and consented thereto, the court, pursuant to § 632.10…”
State v. Moller, 149 N.W.2d 274 (Minn. 1967). “585, if a person’s conduct constitutes more than one offense under the laws of this state he may be punished for only one of such offenses and a conviction or acquittal of any one of them is a bar to prosecution for any other of them. All such offenses may be included in one…”
State v. Bristol, 149 N.W.2d 84 (Minn. 1967). “614, 615 , this court said with reference to § 632.10 (then R. L. 1905, § 5409): “The statute authorizes a certification of criminal cases to this court in two instances only: (1) Where important or doubtful questions arise upon a demurrer or special plea to an indictment; and…”
State v. Townsend, 108 N.W.2d 608 (Minn. 1961). “Sentence was deferred and the case was certified to this court under § 632.10 as indicated. Briefly stated the testimony showed that prior to his last arrest defendant lived at the Harbor Hotel located between Marquette and Second Avenue South in Minneapolis and thereafter at…”
State v. Dilliard, 157 N.W.2d 75 (Minn. 1968). “They denied the motion and certified the question to this court as important and doubtful, thereby making the legal issue involved reviewable under § 632.10. The motion was heard on a stipulation of facts under which it is agreed that the grand jury venire in Hennepin County is…”
State v. Kalkbrenner, 116 N.W.2d 560 (Minn. 1962). “28 for the purpose of having a prisoner, confined in a state penal institution, brought before such court for examination in and/or to answer to a criminal action pending in such court against such prisoner?” That motion was denied since the statute authorizing such procedure, §…”
State v. Robinson, 123 N.W.2d 694 (Minn. 1963). “Defendant now contends that additional information was presented to the trial court, and that the principle was improperly applied when the order appealed from was entered. We are not asked to elucidate an important and doubtful point of law.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.