Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 645. INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES AND RULES
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 645.33 (2026)

Two Or More Amendments To Same Section; One Overlooking The Other

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

When two or more amendments to the same provision of law are enacted at the same or different sessions, one amendment overlooking and making no reference to the other or others, the amendments shall be construed together, if possible, and effect be given to each. If the amendments be irreconcilable, the latest in date of final enactment shall prevail.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1980–1987 · leading case: State v. Jonason, 292 N.W.2d 730 (Minn. 1980).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Jonason, 292 N.W.2d 730 (Minn. 1980). · cites it 2× “See Minn.Stat. §§ 645.33, 645.39 (1978). Here the enactments clearly are reconcilable.”
VanderWeyst v. First State Bank of Benson, 408 N.W.2d 208 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 2× “See Minn.Stat. § 645.33 (1982). Finally, we must reject appellants’ argument that respondent bank was required to abide by the restrictions set forth in chapters 53 and 56.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.