Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 65. FIRE INSURANCE COMPANIES
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 65.05 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1967 c 395 art 6 s 27]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1955–1973 · leading case: Nathan v. St. Paul Mut. Ins. Co., 68 N.W.2d 385 (Minn. 1955).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Nathan v. St. Paul Mut. Ins. Co., 68 N.W.2d 385 (Minn. 1955). · cites it 10× “Section 65.05 provides in part: “Every company insuring any building or other structure against loss or damage by fire, lightning, or other hazard, by the issue of a policy or renewal of one theretofore issued, or otherwise, shall cause the structure to be previously examined, a…”
Antell v. Pearl Assurance Co., 89 N.W.2d 726 (Minn. 1958). · cites it 5× “If the insurer possesses itself of this knowledge, which the statute indicates it is required to do, such knowledge should enable the insurer to determine in accordance with the requirements of the statute the condition of the property with reference to its insurability, and, if…”
Bd. of Trs. of First Congregational Church v. Cream City Mut. Ins., 96 N.W.2d 690 (Minn. 1959). “It is our view that the Alexandra Restaurant and Kahn cases not only represent the better reasoning on the subject but also are in harmony with the public policy as expressed by the legislature in the enactment of the valued policy statute, § 65.05. Under this statute we *356…”
Brooks Realty, Inc. v. Aetna Ins. Co., 149 N.W.2d 494 (Minn. 1967). “05], and from other provisions of the law and of the standard form of policy, * * * that it was intended that in case of a total loss on buildings the recovery shall be on the basis of the insurable value as stated in the policy, but that in the case of a partial loss on…”
Bellanca Aircraft Corp. v. FIREMAN'S FUND Ins. CO., 353 F. Supp. 929 (D. Minn. 1973). “05 which provides in relevant part: “ * * * Every person who solicits insurance and procures an application therefor shall be held to be the agent of the party afterwards issuing insurance thereon or a renewal thereof.” *931 The provision was re-enacted in 1967 and now appears…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.