§
Subdivision 1.Requirement.
Reparation obligors providing basic economic loss insurance in this state shall organize and maintain, subject to approval and regulation by the commissioner, an assigned claims bureau and an assigned claims plan, and adopt rules for their operation and for the assessment of costs on a fair and equitable basis consistent with sections 65B.41 to 65B.71. The assigned claims bureau shall be managed by a governing committee made up of four individuals selected by the insurer members, one individual selected by the self-insurer members, and two public members appointed by the governor to two-year terms. Public members may include licensed insurance agents. If such obligors do not organize and continuously maintain an assigned claims bureau and an assigned claims plan in a manner considered by the commissioner of commerce to be consistent with sections 65B.41 to 65B.71, the commissioner shall organize and maintain an assigned claims bureau and an assigned claims plan. Each reparation obligor providing basic economic loss insurance in this state shall participate in the assigned claims bureau and the assigned claims plan. Costs incurred shall be allocated fairly and equitably among the reparation obligors.
A ruling, action, or decision of the governing committee may be appealed to the commissioner within 30 days. A final action or order of the commissioner is subject to judicial review in the manner provided by chapter 14. In lieu of an appeal to the commissioner, judicial review of the governing committee's ruling, action, or decision may be sought.
§
Subd. 2.Assignment of claims.
The assigned claims bureau shall promptly assign each claim and notify the claimant of the identity and address of the assignee-obligor of the claim. Claims shall be assigned so as to minimize inconvenience to claimants. The assignee thereafter has rights and obligations as if the assignee had issued a policy of basic economic loss insurance complying with sections 65B.41 to 65B.71 applicable to the injury or, in case of financial inability of a reparation obligor to perform its obligations, as if the assignee had written the applicable reparation insurance, undertaken the self-insurance, or lawfully obligated itself to pay basic economic loss benefits.
Notes of Decisions
Mickelson v. Am. Fam. Mut. Ins. Co., 329 N.W.2d 814 (Minn. 1983).
· cites it 16× “Mickelson asserted claims for basic economic loss benefits against American Family Mutual Insurance Company (American Family), the insurer on a policy in which Mickelson's pick-up truck is the described vehicle, or, in the alternative, against Mutual Service Casualty Insurance…”
Mohs v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 349 N.W.2d 580 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984).
· cites it 13× “This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment which determined rights under a portion of the Minnesota No-Fault Automobile Insurance Act relating to the assigned claims plan, Minn.Stat. § 65B.63-§ 65B.65. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of respondent and denied…”
Am. Fam. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Vanman, 453 N.W.2d 48 (Minn. 1990).
· cites it 4× “Sperl, who was uninsured, procured basic economic loss benefits through the Minnesota Automobile Assigned Claims Bureau pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 65B.63 (1988). The bureau assigned the claim to American Family, which paid Sperl’s medical expenses of $16,821.”
Mohs v. Parrish's Bar, 418 N.W.2d 494 (Minn. 1988).
· cites it 4× “The trial court drafted the question certified as follows: Are the subrogation rights, if any, of an insurer paying benefits under the Minnesota Assigned Claims Plan, Minn.”
Iverson v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 295 N.W.2d 573 (Minn. 1980).
· cites it 2× “The widow also joined Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Company as a defendant, claiming that she was entitled to recover economic loss benefits against that insurance company, the insurer to which her claim had been assigned under the assigned claims plan provided in Minn.Stat.…”
Arneson v. Integrity Mut. Ins. Co., 344 N.W.2d 617 (Minn. 1984).
· cites it 2× “Persons who are not insured under any plan of reparation security may, of course, be entitled to no-faült benefits pursuant to the assigned claims plan provided by Minn.Stat. § 65B.63 (1982). 2 . Owner is defined in Minn.”
Dahle v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Ins. Co., 352 N.W.2d 397 (Minn. 1984).
· cites it 2× “71 may obtain basic economic loss benefits through the assigned claims plan or bureau established pursuant to section 65B.63 and in accordance with the provisions for making assigned claims provided in sections 65B.”
Kruse v. Minnesota Auto. Assigned Claims Bureau, 371 N.W.2d 602 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985).
· cites it 2× “Both Kruse and Andersen sought basic economic loss benefits from the Minnesota Automobile Assigned Claims Bureau (Bureau) pursuant to Minn.Stat. §§ 65B.63, .64 (1984). Their claims were assigned to Aet-na Casualty and Surety Co.”
LaBrosse v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 383 N.W.2d 736 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986).
“After the accident LaBrosse applied for basic economic loss benefits to the Minnesota Automobile Assigned Claims Bureau pursuant to Minn.Stat. 65B.63, subd. 2 (1984). His claim was assigned to respondent Aetna Casualty and Surety Company (Aetna), which denied the claim on the…”
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Thunder, 605 N.W.2d 750 (Minn. Ct. App. 2000).
· cites it 2× “71 may obtain basic economic loss benefits through the assigned claims plan or bureau established pursuant to section 65B.63 and in accordance with the provisions for making assigned claims provided in section 65B.”
Munoz v. Kihlgren, 661 N.W.2d 301 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003).
· cites it 2× “2000) (citation and quotation omitted); see also Minn. Stat § 65B.63 (2002) (describing assigned-claims plan); Minn.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.