Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 7.13 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1Sp1985 c 13 s 376]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1987–2024 · leading case: State v. Parsley, 521 N.W.2d 44 (Minn. Ct. App. 1994).
State v. Parsley, 521 N.W.2d 44 (Minn. Ct. App. 1994). “Scott, Substantive Criminal Law § 7.13(a) at 288 (1986). A predicate misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor, to support a conviction for first degree manslaughter, must be committed “with such force and violence that death of or great bodily harm * * * was reasonably foreseeable.”
City of Bemidji v. Beighley, 410 N.W.2d 338 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). “Anderson, American Law of Zoning § 7.13 (3d ed. 1986). Historically, courts have hesitated to allow cities to base their zoning regulations on aethestic considerations alone.”
SurModics, Inc. v. S. Rsch. Inst., 940 F. Supp. 2d 938 (D. Minnesota 2013). “Section 7.13 of the Agreement divides responsibility for paying those royalties between SRI and SurModics.”
Mortier v. LivaNova USA, Inc. (D. Minnesota 2022). “2 Although not raised specifically in the complaint, Mortier now contends that LivaNova also breached Section 7.13 of the UPA by failing to provide Caisson with sufficient financial resources.”
State of Minnesota v. Julian Daniel Valdez (Minn. 2024). “At the time of trial, the relevant model instruction was found at section 7.13 of the Criminal Jury Instruction Guide (CRIMJIG).”
State of Minnesota v. Julian Daniel Valdez (Minn. Ct. App. 2023). “Specifically, the treatise states that “the ability of the defendant to retreat without risk to 3 The district court’s instruction is similar to a model jury instruction that is intended to apply to both self-defense and defense-of-others.”
— Minn. Stat. § 7.13(a) — 1 case
State v. Parsley, 521 N.W.2d 44 (Minn. Ct. App. 1994). “Scott, Substantive Criminal Law § 7.13(a) at 288 (1986). A predicate misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor, to support a conviction for first degree manslaughter, must be committed “with such force and violence that death of or great bodily harm * * * was reasonably foreseeable.”
— Minn. Stat. § 7.13(b) — 1 case
SurModics, Inc. v. S. Rsch. Inst., 940 F. Supp. 2d 938 (D. Minnesota 2013). “Section 7.13 of the Agreement divides responsibility for paying those royalties between SRI and SurModics.”
— Minn. Stat. § 7.13(c) — 1 case
SurModics, Inc. v. S. Rsch. Inst., 940 F. Supp. 2d 938 (D. Minnesota 2013). “Section 7.13 of the Agreement divides responsibility for paying those royalties between SRI and SurModics.”
— Minn. Stat. § 7.13(d) — 1 case
SurModics, Inc. v. S. Rsch. Inst., 940 F. Supp. 2d 938 (D. Minnesota 2013). “Section 7.13 of the Agreement divides responsibility for paying those royalties between SRI and SurModics.”
— Minn. Stat. § 7.13(d)(i) — 1 case
SurModics, Inc. v. S. Rsch. Inst., 940 F. Supp. 2d 938 (D. Minnesota 2013). “Section 7.13 of the Agreement divides responsibility for paying those royalties between SRI and SurModics.”
— Minn. Stat. § 7.13(d)(i)(2) — 1 case
SurModics, Inc. v. S. Rsch. Inst., 940 F. Supp. 2d 938 (D. Minnesota 2013). “Section 7.13 of the Agreement divides responsibility for paying those royalties between SRI and SurModics.”
— Minn. Stat. § 7.13(e) — 1 case
State v. Parsley, 521 N.W.2d 44 (Minn. Ct. App. 1994). “Scott, Substantive Criminal Law § 7.13(a) at 288 (1986). A predicate misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor, to support a conviction for first degree manslaughter, must be committed “with such force and violence that death of or great bodily harm * * * was reasonably foreseeable.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.