Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 8.03 (2026)
Prosecutions
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The attorney general shall cause to be prosecuted all assessors and other officials for such delinquencies in connection with revenue laws as may become known; also all bonds of officers and others upon which any liability to the state has accrued. When any corporation shall have offended against the laws of the state, or misused, surrendered, abandoned, or forfeited its corporate authority, or any of its franchises or privileges, the attorney general shall cause proceedings to be instituted against it.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1967–2025 · leading case: Warren v. Dinter, 926 N.W.2d 370 (Minn. 2019).
Warren v. Dinter, 926 N.W.2d 370 (Minn. 2019). “Louisell & Harold Williams, Medical Malpractice § 8.03(1) n.1 (2018) (outlining other cases in which courts have so ruled).”
Westerberg v. Sch. Dist. No. 792, Todd Cnty., 148 N.W.2d 312 (Minn. 1967). “1 Frumer & Friedman, Products Liability, § 8.03, where cases on this subject are exhaustively examined.”
Friederichs v. Gorz, 624 F. Supp. 2d 1058 (D. Minnesota 2009). “) Notwithstanding Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(l)’s admonition that a complaint must contain a “short and plain statement of the grounds for the court’s jurisdiction,” the fact that a complaint fails to cite a specific federal statute is not dispositive of the…”
Greene v. Simpson (D. Minnesota 2025). “01 ; Minn. Stat. § 8.03 . As best as I can tell, the Greenes believe a letter Kyle Greene sent to County Attorney Schiefelbein constitutes a criminal complaint under Minnesota Rule of Criminal Procedure 2, and they claim her failure to investigate the letter’s allegations was a…”
— Minn. Stat. § 8.03(1) — 1 case
Warren v. Dinter, 926 N.W.2d 370 (Minn. 2019). “Louisell & Harold Williams, Medical Malpractice § 8.03(1) n.1 (2018) (outlining other cases in which courts have so ruled).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.