Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 80.26 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1973 c 451 s 32 subd 1]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 8 cases, 1943–2010 · leading case: Kopperud v. Agers, 312 N.W.2d 443 (Minn. 1981).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Kopperud v. Agers, 312 N.W.2d 443 (Minn. 1981). · cites it 16× “Shelley Richey from an order denying his motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and on the following certified question: “Whether equity may operate to toll the running of the statutory bar established by Minn.Stat. § 80.26 (1971), of an action alleging a violation…”

Bailey v. Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood, Inc., 414 F. Supp. 475 (D. Minnesota 1976). · cites it 17× “Minn.Stat. § 80.26 with its six year limitation provision was first enacted in 1941.”

Interstate Power Co. v. Nobles Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 617 N.W.2d 566 (Minn. 2000). · cites it 4× “Laws 1119 (codified as amended at Minn.Stat. § 80.26 (1941).) On appeal, we were asked to decide if the legislature intended with this new legislation to lift the bar of the statute where the statute of limitations had already run; if the legislature had the power to do so; and…”

Curtis v. Altria Grp., Inc., 792 N.W.2d 836 (Minn. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 5× “Based on the language of Minn.Stat. § 80.26 (1971), 8 the supreme court concluded that the legislature “did not intend the fraudulent concealment rule for tolling purposes.”

Semrad v. Edina Realty, Inc., 470 N.W.2d 135 (Minn. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 6× “Statute of Limitations Minn.Stat. § 80.26 (1971), the precursor to Minn.”

Klapmeier v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., 363 F. Supp. 1212 (D. Minnesota 1973). · cites it 8× “In Minnesota the statute of limitations in the Securities Act is Minn.Stat. § 80.26 (1969). However, the Minnesota Securities Act does not contain a substantive provision which is close to the Eighth Circuit definition of Rule 10b-5 as the Arkansas Act did.”

Donaldson v. Chase Sec. Corp., 13 N.W.2d 1 (Minn. 1943). “1941, § 80.26 [Mason St. 1941 Supp. § 3996-24]), the legislature for the first time enacted a specific limitation upon actions based upon unlawful sales of securities, or deceit in connection therewith, and fixed six years from the date of delivery of the securities as the time…”

Appelbaum v. Ceres Land Co., 687 F.2d 261 (8th Cir. 1982). · cites it 2× “Levitt contends that the applicable statute of limitations is found in Minn.Stat.Ann. § 80.26 (West 1968) which provides that suit must be brought within six years of the date on which the securities were delivered to the purchaser.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.