Mississippi Code
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-15-101 (2024)
Agreements to which arbitration provisions apply
✓ Justia copy: laws through about 2024 (2025 and 2026 sessions missing)
- (1) Sections 11-15-101 through 11-15-143 apply only to agreements and provisions for arbitration made subsequent to July 1, 1981.
- (2) Sections 11-15-101 through 11-15-143 shall apply to any agreement for the planning, design, engineering, construction, erection, repair or alteration of any building, structure, fixture, road, highway, utility or any part thereof, and to any purchase by, or supply to, any contractor or subcontractor qualified to do business in this state of any materials to be used in the planning, design, engineering, construction, erection, repair or alteration of any building, structure, fixture, road, highway, utility or any part thereof; provided, however, that nothing contained in Sections 11-15-101 through 11-15-143 shall be construed as amending or otherwise affecting the provisions of Sections 65-2-1 through 65-2-17, Section 65-1-89, Section 65-1-91, and Section 77-9-387, Mississippi Code of 1972.
- (3) Sections 11-15-101 through 11-15-143 shall also apply to any agreement for architectural, engineering, surveying, planning and related professional services performed in connection with any of the agreements enumerated in subsection (2) of this section.
- (4) Sections 11-15-101 through 11-15-143 shall have no effect on the establishment or enforcement of any lien provided for in Title 85, Chapter 7, Mississippi Code of 1972.
Laws, 1981, ch. 495, § 1, eff. 7/1/1981.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1988–2022 · leading case: Wilson v. Greyhound Bus Lines, Inc., 830 So. 2d 1151 (Miss. 2002).
Wilson v. Greyhound Bus Lines, Inc., 830 So. 2d 1151 (Miss. 2002). “Although a case involving arbitration pursuant to a home renovation contract applying Miss.Code Ann. §§ 11-15-101 et seq., one of our prior decisions offers guidance here.”
City of Mound Bayou v. Johnson, 562 So. 2d 1212 (Miss. 1990). “Pursuant to a building contract's provision and arbitration statutes, Miss. Code Ann. § 11-15-101 et seq., arbitrator Craig had entered an award in favor of a homeowner.”
Craig v. Barber, 524 So. 2d 974 (Miss. 1988). “See Miss. Code Ann. §§ 11-15-101 , et seq. (Supp.”
D. W. Caldwell, Inc. v. W.G. Yates & Sons Constr. Co., 242 So. 3d 92 (Miss. 2018). “Miss. Code Ann. § 11-15-101 (Rev. 2004). Because the underlying dispute concerns the installation of a roof and a subcontract between two contractors, the laws under this section control the discussion below.”
Abbey Bridges Constr. Co., LLC v. Kroger Ltd. P'ship I, No. 3:21-cv-00063 (N.D. Miss. Mar. 31, 2022). “, and the Mississippi Construction Industry Arbitration Act, Miss. Code Ann., §§ 11-15-101, et seq., favor the arbitration process.”
Am. Contractors Indem. Co. v. Reflectech, Inc., No. 1:18-cv-00297 (S.D. Miss. Aug. 27, 2019). “Miss. Code Ann. § 11-15-101 - 143; Harrison Cty.”
Romain Powell Wilson v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., No. 2001-CP-00124-SCT (Miss. Jan. 9, 2001). “Although a case involving arbitration pursuant to a home renovation contract applying Miss. Code Ann. §§ 11-15-101 et seq., one of our prior decisions offers guidance here.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.