Miss. Code Ann. » Miss. Code Ann. / Title 13 / Chapter 5
Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 13-5-32 (2024)

Names of jurors drawn from jury box to be made public; exception

✓ Justia copy: laws through about 2024 (2025 and 2026 sessions missing)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The names of jurors drawn from the jury box shall be made available to the public unless the court determines in any instance that this information in the interest of justice should be kept confidential or its use limited in whole or in part.

Laws, 1974, ch. 378, § 6(5), eff. 1/1/1975.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1981–2004 · leading case: King v. State, 857 So. 2d 702 (Miss. 2003).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
King v. State, 857 So. 2d 702 (Miss. 2003). · cites it 8× “Citing Miss.Code Ann. § 13-5-32 (Rev.2000), as amended, King contends that, "[b]y going outside the statute, error was committed.”
Swindle v. State, 502 So. 2d 652 (Miss. 1987). · cites it 3× “The Court said: Another proposition argued is that under recently enacted Mississippi Code Annotated § 13-5-32 (Supp. 1980) the trial judge erroneously sequestered the jury list.”
Valentine v. State, 396 So. 2d 15 (Miss. 1981). · cites it 3× “Another proposition argued is that under recently enacted Mississippi Code Annotated § 13-5-32 (Supp. 1980) the trial judge erroneously sequestered the jury list.”
Gannett Co. v. State, 571 A.2d 735 (Del. 1990). · cites it 2× “5; Miss. Code Ann. § 13-5-32 ; N.D.Code 27-09.”
King v. State, 897 So. 2d 981 (Miss. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “1981) (quoting Miss.Code Ann. § 13-5-32 (Supp.1980)). The judge decided in the case at bar to keep the jurors' names secret based on events from King's previous prosecution which created suspicion of witness tampering.”
David Earl King v. State of Mississippi, No. 2001-KA-00786-SCT (Miss. Oct. 2, 2001). · cites it 8× “Citing Miss. Code Ann. § 13-5-32 (Rev. 2000), as amended, King contends that, “[b]y going outside the statute, error was committed.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.