Miss. Code Ann. » Miss. Code Ann. / Title 15 / Chapter 3
Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 15-3-3 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Repealed by Laws of 2006, ch. 371, § 13, eff. 7/1/2006.

Codes, Hutchinson's 1848, ch. 47, art. 1 (2); 1857, ch. 44, art. 2; 1871, § 2893; 1880, § 1293; 1892, §§ 4226, 4227; 1906, §§ 4776, 4777; Hemingway's 1917, §§ 3120, 3121; 1930, §§ 3344, 3345; 1942, §§ 265, 266.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1975–2023 · leading case: Morreale v. Morreale, 646 So. 2d 1264 (Miss. 1994).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Morreale v. Morreale, 646 So. 2d 1264 (Miss. 1994). · cites it 3× “To invalidate fraudulent conveyances, Miss. Code Ann. § 15-3-3 (1972) was enacted to avert debtors from keeping property, accessible to payment of their debts, away from creditors.”
Coors of North Mississippi, Inc. v. Bank of Longview (In Re Coors of North Mississippi, Inc.), 66 B.R. 845 (Bankr. N.D. Miss. 1986). · cites it 4× “§ 544(b), permits the trustee or debtor in possession to utilize the state fraudulent conveyance statute, Miss.Code Ann. § 15-3-3 (1972), which is time barred only by the state six year statute of limitations, Miss.”
Morris v. MacIone, 546 So. 2d 969 (Miss. 1989). “Miss. Code Ann. §§ 15-3-3 , et seq. (1972).”
Barbee v. Pigott, 507 So. 2d 77 (Miss. 1987). · cites it 2× “5, which has since been recodified as Miss. Code Ann. § 15-3-3 . Many states have also adopted the Uniform Fraudulent Conveyance Act (1918) (UFCA), which in general is declaratory of the rules of common law interpreting the English statute.”
In Re Shavers, 418 B.R. 589 (Bankr. S.D. Miss. 2009). · cites it 2× “§ 544 (b) and Miss.Code Ann. § 15-3-3; (2) recovering the Bayou Residence from the bankruptcy estate of Ariana Shavers under 11 U.”
Stanley v. Pilots of Gulfport, Inc., 951 So. 2d 535 (Miss. 2006). “Regarding the fraudulent transaction, the main issue in this case is not whether there was a fraudulent conveyance but what assets were fraudulently conveyed under Miss.Code Ann. § 15-3-3 (repealed 2006). [2] Fraudulent conveyance of an entire business was thoroughly examined by…”
Morgan v. Sauls, 413 So. 2d 370 (Miss. 1982). · cites it 2× “2d 29 (1963), this Court held the victim was a creditor of a tort-feasor, and entitled to the benefit of the statute prohibiting conveyances to defraud creditors, presently Miss. Code Ann. § 15-3-3 (Supp. 1981). In so holding, we overruled two previous cases which indicate…”
Joe T. Dehmer Distributors, Inc. v. Murry Owen Temple, Joyce S. Temple, 826 F.2d 1463 (5th Cir. 1987). “6 Miss.Code Ann. § 15-3-3 (1986) voids “every .”
Smith v. Orman, 822 So. 2d 975 (Miss. Ct. App. 2002). “Miss.Code Ann. § 15-3-3 (Rev.1995). Two exceptions are conveyances that are made "upon good consideration" and conveyances, although fraudulent, which are made prior to the incurring of a debt with a creditor.”
Braxton v. Johnson, 514 So. 2d 1232 (Miss. 1987). “Johnson also asserted that the purported gift of the notes was void under Miss. Code Ann. § 15-3-3 . In the same *1235 motion, Johnson moved to have Mrs.”
In Re Gulfport Pilots Ass'n, Inc., 434 B.R. 380 (Bankr. S.D. Miss. 2010). “Miss.Code Ann. § 15-3-3, repealed and replaced by Miss.”
In the Matter of Ludlum Enter., Inc., Bankrupt. Am. Indus. Leasing Co. v. David S. Searles, Tr., 510 F.2d 996 (5th Cir. 1975). “275 (1853), held the predecessor to Miss.Code § 15-3-3 not to apply to “a hiring of goods,” i.”
Show all 17 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.