Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 41-21-83 (2026)

Hearing on need for further treatment

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Except as otherwise provided in Section 41-21-63, if a hearing is requested as provided in Section 41-21-74, 41-21-81 or 41-21-99, the court shall not make a determination of the need for continued commitment unless a hearing is held and the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that (a) the person continues to have mental illness or have an intellectual disability; and (b) involuntary commitment is necessary for the protection of the patient or others; and (c) there is no alternative to involuntary commitment. Hearings held under this section shall be held in the chancery court of the county where the facility is located; however, if the patient is confined at the Mississippi State Hospital at Whitfield, Mississippi, the hearing shall be conducted by the Chancery Court of the First Judicial District of Hinds County, Mississippi.

The hearing shall be held within fourteen (14) days after receipt by the court of the request for a hearing. The court may continue the hearing for good cause shown. The clerk shall ascertain whether the patient is represented by counsel, and, if the patient is not represented, shall notify the chancellor who shall appoint counsel for him if the chancellor determines that the patient for any reason does not have the services of an attorney; however, the patient may waive the appointment of counsel subject to the approval of the court. Notice of the time and place of the hearing shall be served at least seventy-two (72) hours before the time of the hearing upon the patient, his attorney, the director, and the person requesting the hearing, if other than the patient, and any witnesses requested by the patient or his attorney, or any witnesses the court may deem necessary or desirable.

The patient must be present at the hearing unless the chancellor determines that the patient is unable to attend and makes that determination and the reasons therefor part of the record.

The court shall put its findings and the reasons supporting its findings in writing and shall have copies delivered to the patient, his attorney, and the director of the treatment facility. An appeal from the final commitment order by either party may be had on the terms prescribed for appeals in civil cases; however, such appeal shall be without supersedeas. The record on appeal shall include the transcript of the commitment hearing.

Laws, 1975, ch. 492, § 5(2-5); Laws, 1984, ch. 477, § 12; Laws, 1985, ch. 454, § 5; Laws, 1994, ch. 533, § 9; Laws, 1994, ch. 599, § 9; Laws, 2001, ch. 331, § 4; Laws, 2010, ch. 476, § 64, eff. 4/1/2010.

Amended by Laws, 2024, ch. 479, HB 1088,§ 7, eff. 7/1/2024.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 1987–2017 · leading case: M. L. B. v. S. L. J., 519 U.S. 102 (1996).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

M. L. B. v. S. L. J., 519 U.S. 102 (1996). “Miss. Code Ann. § 41-21-83 (Supp. 1996) (record on appeal shall include transcript of commitment hearing); Miss.”

Mississippi Dept. of Mental Health v. Hall, 936 So. 2d 917 (Miss. 2006). “" Miss.Code Ann. § 41-21-83 (Rev. 2005). [9] Hardaway testified that a patient advocate protects the rights of patients and investigates any allegations of abuse, neglect or exploitation.”

Ralph Arnold Smith, Jr. v. State of Mississippi, 229 So. 3d 178 (Miss. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “]” See Miss. Code Ann. § 41-21-83 . The statute did not stop there, however.”

Mlb v. Slj, 519 U.S. 102 (1996). “Miss. Code Ann. § 41-21-83 (Supp. 1996) (record on appeal shall include transcript of commitment hearing); Miss.”

McIntire v. Moore, 512 So. 2d 687 (Miss. 1987). “The reasons why the power to deny supersedeas should be vested in the chancery court in the case of one committed for treatment of alcoholism are comparable to those reasons existing in the case of one committed for treatment for mental illness.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.