Miss. Code Ann. » Miss. Code Ann. / Title 41 / Chapter 29
Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-503 (2024)

Admissibility of evidence obtained in violation of this article

✓ Justia copy: laws through about 2024 (2025 and 2026 sessions missing)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The contents of an intercepted wire, oral or other communication and evidence derived from an intercepted wire, oral or other communication may not be received in evidence in any trial, hearing or other proceeding in or before any court, grand jury, department, officer, agency, regulatory body, legislative committee, or other authority of the United States or of this state or a political subdivision of this state if the disclosure of that information would be in violation of this article. The contents of an intercepted wire, oral or other communication and evidence derived from an intercepted communication may be received in a civil trial, hearing or other proceeding only if the civil trial, hearing or other proceeding arises out of a violation of the criminal law of this state.

Laws, 1989, ch. 553, § 2; repealed, Laws, 1989, ch. 553, § 19; enacted, Laws, 1992, ch. 561, § 2; Laws, 1995, ch. 520, § 2; reenacted without change, Laws, 2004, ch. 511, § 2, eff. 7/1/2004.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1995–2002 · leading case: Wright v. Stanley, 700 So. 2d 274 (Miss. 1997).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Wright v. Stanley, 700 So. 2d 274 (Miss. 1997). “Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-503 (Supp. 1995).”
Benson v. State, 821 So. 2d 823 (Miss. 2002). “Benson argues that Breeland should have objected to the use of the audio recording as a violation of Miss.Code Ann. § 41-29-503 (2001) and as a violation of the Fourth Amendment.”
Ott v. State, 722 So. 2d 576 (Miss. 1998). “Miss.Code Ann. § 41-29-503 (Supp.1997) (emphasis added).”
J Stephen Wright v. Carol P Stanley, No. 95-CA-01119-SCT (Miss. Sept. 26, 1995). “Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-503 (Supp. 1995).”
Stevie T. Ott v. State of Mississippi, No. 97-KA-00718-SCT (Miss. May 21, 1997). “Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-503 (Supp. 1997) (emphasis added).”
Bruce Benson v. State of Mississippi, No. 2000-CA-00704-SCT (Miss. Mar. 31, 2000). “Benson argues that Breeland should have objected to the use of the audio recording as a violation of Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-503 (2001) and as a violation of the Fourth Amendment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.