Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 41-41-51 (2024)

Definitions

✓ Justia copy: laws through about 2024 (2025 and 2026 sessions missing)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

For purposes of Sections 41-41-51 through 41-41-63, the following definitions shall apply:

Laws, 1986, ch. 448, § 1, eff. 7/1/1986.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1993–2001 · leading case: Pro-Choice Mississippi v. Fordice, 716 So. 2d 645 (Miss. 1998).
Pro-Choice Mississippi v. Fordice, 716 So. 2d 645 (Miss. 1998). · cites it 3× “Louis) challenged the facial constitutionality of the parental consent abortion statutes, Miss. Code Ann. §§ 41-41-51 through 41-41-63.”
Helen B. Barnes v. State of Mississippi, 992 F.2d 1335 (5th Cir. 1993). “In cases where the parents are divorced or are unmarried and separated, then only the consent of the parent with primary custody is required.”
R.B. ex rel. V.D. v. State, 790 So. 2d 830 (Miss. 2001). “However, Mississippi statutes, Miss.Code Ann. §§ 41-41-51 to 63 (1993) provide for an abortion under the facts at hand.”
Pro-Choice Mississippi v. Kirk Fordice, No. 95-CA-00960-SCT (Miss. Aug. 30, 1995). · cites it 3× “Louis) challenged the facial constitutionality of the parental consent abortion statutes, Miss. Code Ann. §§ 41-41-51 through 41-41-63.”
RB ex rel. VD v. State, 790 So. 2d 830 (Miss. 2001). · cites it 2× “was not mature and well-informed enough to make the abortion decision on her own, and that having an abortion would not be in R.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.