Mississippi Code
Miss. Code Ann. § 47-7-27 (2026)
Return of violator of parole or earned release supervision; arrest of offender; hearing; revocation of parole; imprisonment for technical violation to be served in technical violation center
✓ current as of July 2026
- (1) The board may, at any time and upon a showing of probable violation of parole, issue a warrant for the return of any paroled offender to the custody of the department. The warrant shall authorize all persons named therein to return the paroled offender to actual custody of the department from which he was paroled.
- (2) Any field supervisor may arrest an offender without a warrant or may deputize any other person with power of arrest by giving him a written statement setting forth that the offender has, in the judgment of that field supervisor, violated the conditions of his parole or earned-release supervision. The written statement delivered with the offender by the arresting officer to the official in charge of the department facility from which the offender was released or other place of detention designated by the department shall be sufficient warrant for the detention of the offender.
- (3) The field supervisor, after making an arrest, shall present to the detaining authorities a similar statement of the circumstances of violation. The field supervisor shall at once notify the board or department of the arrest and detention of the offender and shall submit a written report showing in what manner the offender has violated the conditions of parole or earned-release supervision. An offender for whose return a warrant has been issued by the board shall, after the issuance of the warrant, be deemed a fugitive from justice.
- (4) Whenever an offender is arrested on a warrant for an alleged violation of parole as herein provided, the board shall hold an informal preliminary hearing within seventy-two (72) hours to determine whether there is reasonable cause to believe the person has violated a condition of parole. A preliminary hearing shall not be required when the offender is not under arrest on a warrant or the offender signed a waiver of a preliminary hearing. The preliminary hearing may be conducted electronically.
- (5) The right of the State of Mississippi to extradite persons and return fugitives from justice, from other states to this state, shall not be impaired by this chapter and shall remain in full force and effect. An offender convicted of a felony committed while on parole, whether in the State of Mississippi or another state, shall immediately have his parole revoked upon presentment of a certified copy of the commitment order to the board. If an offender is on parole and the offender is convicted of a felony for a crime committed prior to the offender being placed on parole, whether in the State of Mississippi or another state, the offender may have his parole revoked upon presentment of a certified copy of the commitment order to the board.
- (6)
- (a) The board shall hold a hearing for any parolee who is detained as a result of a warrant or a violation report within twenty-one (21) days of the parolee's admission to detention. The board may, in its discretion, terminate the parole or modify the terms and conditions thereof. If the board revokes parole for one or more technical violations the board shall impose a period of imprisonment to be served in a technical violation center operated by the department not to exceed ninety (90) days for the first revocation and not to exceed one hundred twenty (120) days for the second revocation. For the third revocation, the board may impose a period of imprisonment to be served in a technical violation center for up to one hundred and eighty (180) days or the board may impose the remainder of the suspended portion of the sentence. For the fourth and any subsequent revocation, the board may impose up to the remainder of the suspended portion of the sentence. The period of imprisonment in a technical violation center imposed under this section shall not be reduced in any manner.
- (b) If the board does not hold a hearing or does not take action on the violation within the twenty-one-day time frame in paragraph (a) of this subsection, the parolee shall be released from detention and shall return to parole status. The board may subsequently hold a hearing and may revoke parole or may continue parole and modify the terms and conditions of parole. If the board revokes parole for one or more technical violations the board shall impose a period of imprisonment to be served in a technical violation center operated by the department not to exceed ninety (90) days for the first revocation and not to exceed one hundred twenty (120) days for the second revocation. For the third revocation, the board may impose a period of imprisonment to be served in a technical violation center for up to one hundred eighty (180) days or the board may impose the remainder of the suspended portion of the sentence. For the fourth and any subsequent revocation, the board may impose up to the remainder of the suspended portion of the sentence. The period of imprisonment in a technical violation center imposed under this section shall not be reduced in any manner.
- (c) For a parolee charged with one or more technical violations who has not been detained awaiting the revocation hearing, the board may hold a hearing within a reasonable time. The board may revoke parole or may continue parole and modify the terms and conditions of parole. If the board revokes parole for one or more technical violations the board shall impose a period of imprisonment to be served in a technical violation center operated by the department not to exceed ninety (90) days for the first revocation and not to exceed one hundred twenty (120) days for the second revocation. For the third revocation, the board may impose a period of imprisonment to be served in a technical violation center for up to one hundred eighty (180) days or the board may impose the remainder of the suspended portion of the sentence. For the fourth and any subsequent revocation, the board may impose up to the remainder of the suspended portion of the sentence. The period of imprisonment in a technical violation center imposed under this section shall not be reduced in any manner.
- (7) Unless good cause for the delay is established in the record of the proceeding, the parole revocation charge shall be dismissed if the revocation hearing is not held within the thirty (30) days of the issuance of the warrant.
- (8) The chairman and each member of the board and the designated parole revocation hearing officer may, in the discharge of their duties, administer oaths, summon and examine witnesses, and take other steps as may be necessary to ascertain the truth of any matter about which they have the right to inquire.
- (9) The board shall provide semiannually to the Oversight Task Force the number of warrants issued for an alleged violation of parole, the average time between detention on a warrant and preliminary hearing, the average time between detention on a warrant and revocation hearing, the number of ninety-day sentences in a technical violation center issued by the board, the number of one-hundred-twenty-day sentences in a technical violation center issued by the board, the number of one-hundred-eighty-day sentences issued by the board, and the number and average length of the suspended sentences imposed by the board in response to a violation.
Codes, 1942, § 4004-13; Laws, 1944, ch. 334, § 11; Laws, 1950, ch. 524, § 14; Laws, 1956, ch. 262, § 6; Laws, 1976, ch. 440, § 86; reenacted, Laws, 1981, ch. 465, § 103; reenacted, Laws, 1984, ch. 471, § 113; Laws, 1986, ch. 357, § 1; reenacted, Laws, 1986, ch. 413, § 113; Laws, 1989, ch. 306, § 1; Laws, 1995, ch. 596, § 7; Laws, 2010, ch. 470, § 1; Laws, 2012, ch. 488, § 1, eff. 4/26/2012.
Amended by Laws, 2018, ch. 416, HB 387,§ 10, eff. 7/1/2018.
Amended by Laws, 2014, ch. 457, HB 585, 56, eff. 7/1/2014.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 31
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1975–2023 · leading case: Taylor v. State, 672 So. 2d 1246 (Miss. 1996).
Taylor v. State, 672 So. 2d 1246 (Miss. 1996). “" See Miss. Code Ann. § 47-7-27 (1991 Supp.). When Taylor was charged with murder, the State was certainly well within its rights to revoke Taylor's parole and keep him incarcerated.”
State v. Anderson, 136 P.3d 406 (Kan. 2006). “430(1) (1956); Miss. Code Ann. §§ 47-7-27 , 47-7-37 (1944); Mo.”
Edmond v. Mississippi Dept. of Corr., 783 So. 2d 675 (Miss. 2001). “Finding that Edmond's claims are not time-barred pursuant to the three-year statute of limitations as set forth in § 99-39-5(2) and finding that there is insufficient evidence to determine whether Edmond was afforded proper revocation procedure, we reverse and remand this case…”
Moore v. Ruth, 556 So. 2d 1059 (Miss. 1990). “Miss. Code Ann. § 47-7-27 (Supp. 1989). Obviously, commission of a felony while on parole is grounds for revocation, see Bobkoskie v.”
Alexander v. State, 667 So. 2d 1 (Miss. 1995). “Miss. Code Ann. § 47-7-27 (Supp. 1989). Obviously, commission of a felony while on parole is grounds for revocation, [citation omitted], nor is it necessary that parole authorities await the principal trial before commencing proceedings to have the parole revoked.”
Walker v. State, 35 So. 3d 555 (Miss. Ct. App. 2010). “Miss.Code Ann. § 47-7-27. Furthermore, we note the record shows a preliminary revocation hearing and a parole-revocation hearing were held.”
Moore v. State, 587 So. 2d 1193 (Miss. 1991). “Miss. Code Ann. § 47-7-27 (Supp. 1989)." Moore v.”
Elkins v. State, 116 So. 3d 185 (Miss. Ct. App. 2013). “1990) (citing Miss. Code Ann. § 47-7-27 (Supp.1989)). There are also minimum due-process requirements for parole-revocation procedures, one of which is that the parolee is entitled to “a written statement by the fact finders as to the evidence relied on and reasons for revoking .”
Edmond v. Hancock, 830 So. 2d 658 (Miss. Ct. App. 2002). “Miss.Code Ann. § 47-7-27 (Rev.2000). The parole board has discretion to determine whether a reconsideration hearing will be held.”
Stephen Montalto v. State of Mississippi, 272 So. 3d 132 (Miss. Ct. App. 2019). “at 1118-19 (¶¶15-16) (citing Miss. Code Ann. § 47-7-27 (3) (Supp. 2013)).”
Godsey v. Houston, 584 So. 2d 389 (Miss. 1991). “That statute provides, inter alia, that: A parolee convicted of a felony while on parole, whether in the State of Mississippi or another state, shall immediately have his parole revoked upon presentment of a certified copy of the commitment order to the board.”
Weeks v. State, 139 So. 3d 727 (Miss. Ct. App. 2013). “See Miss.Code Ann. § 47-7-27 (Supp.2012). The appellant possesses a duty to ensure that the record supports his assignments of error.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 47-7-27(1) — 1 case
Johnnie Wheeler v. State of Mississippi, 164 So. 3d 501 (Miss. Ct. App. 2015).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.