Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 47-7-5 (2026)

[Repealed effective 7/1/2027] State Parole Board created; membership; requirements; vacancies; expenses; immunity; budget; responsibilities to offenders; electronic monitoring program; central registry of paroled inmates; minimum vote required to grant parole to inmate convicted of capital murder or sex crime

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Codes, 1942, § 4004-01; Laws, 1942, ch. 283; Laws, 1944, ch. 334, § 3; Laws, 1950, ch. 524, §§ 2, 3; Laws, 1956, ch. 262, § 2; Laws, 1960, ch. 272; Laws, 1968, ch. 362, § 1; Laws, 1976, ch. 440, § 80; Laws, 1978, ch. 520, § 13; Laws, 1980, ch. 560, § 21; reenacted, Laws, 1981, ch. 465, § 93; reenacted, Laws, 1984, ch. 471, § 103; reenacted, Laws, 1986, ch. 413, § 103; Laws, 1989, 1st Ex Sess, ch. 3, § 1; Laws, 1992, ch. 346, § 1; Laws, 1993, ch. 575, § 1; reenacted and amended, Laws, 1994 Ex Sess, ch. 25, § 1; amended, Laws, 1995, ch. 596, § 1; Laws, 1997, ch. 602, § 2; Laws, 2000, ch. 612, § 1; Laws, 2002, ch. 560, § 1; Laws, 2004, ch. 569, § 2; Laws, 2005, ch. 485, § 1; Laws, 2006, ch. 570, § 1; Laws, 2007, ch. 597, § 1; Laws, 2009, ch. 513, § 1; Laws, 2012, ch. 320, § 1, eff. 4/5/2012.

Amended by Laws, 2024, ch. 497, SB 2799,§ 18, eff. 7/1/2024.

Amended by Laws, 2024, ch. 465, SB 2448,§ 3, eff. 7/1/2024.

Amended by Laws, 2022, ch. 359, HB 683,§ 1, eff. 7/1/2022.

Amended by Laws, 2021, ch. 479, SB 2795,§ 5, eff. 7/1/2021.

Amended by Laws, 2021, ch. 430, HB 928,§ 3, eff. 7/1/2021.

Amended by Laws, 2018, ch. 410, HB 892,§ 1, eff. 7/1/2018.

Amended by Laws, 2018, ch. 326, SB 2654,§ 1, eff. 7/1/2018.

Amended by Laws, 2014, ch. 457, HB 585, 52, eff. 7/1/2014.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 23 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1990–2025 · leading case: Cotton v. Mississippi Parole Bd., 863 So. 2d 917 (Miss. 2003).
Cotton v. Mississippi Parole Bd., 863 So. 2d 917 (Miss. 2003). · cites it 4× “The Court found that the Parole Board has exclusive authority to grant or deny parole under Miss.Code Ann. § 47-7-5 with absolute discretion.”
Jones v. State, 122 So. 3d 698 (Miss. 2013). · cites it 2× “at 598 (citing Miss.Code Ann. § 47-7-5 (Supp.1998)). The opinion noted that, while "certain statutes specify that a trial court may or must impose a sentence 'without the possibility of parole’ .”
Brown v. State, 731 So. 2d 595 (Miss. 1999). “Miss.Code Ann. § 47-7-5 (Supp. 1998). Generally, a trial court has no authority to remove or a revoke a prisoner's parole eligibility.”
Mangum v. Mississippi Parole Bd., 76 So. 3d 762 (Miss. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “1996)); see Miss.Code Ann. § 47-7-5(3) (Supp.2009). Thus, an inmate has no absolute entitlement to parole.”
Lanier v. State, 635 So. 2d 813 (Miss. 1994). “But it is the executive branch, via the parole board, that implements the legislature's parole policies and determines the actual time served by those convicted of crimes.”
Sykes v. Grantham, 567 So. 2d 200 (Miss. 1990). · cites it 3× “PART I HAWKINS, Presiding Justice, for the Court: FACTS Pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. § 47-7-5 (1984 Supp.), Ch.”
Carter v. State, 754 So. 2d 1207 (Miss. 2000). “See Miss.Code Ann. § 47-7-5(3) (Supp. 1990). Miss.”
In re Hooker, 87 So. 3d 401 (Miss. 2012). “Miss.Code Ann. § 47-7-5(1) (Rev. 2011). *431 ¶ 103.”
Mitchell v. State, 561 So. 2d 1037 (Miss. 1990). “Miss. Code Ann. § 47-7-5 (1972), as Amended.”
Brown v. State, 90 So. 3d 645 (Miss. Ct. App. 2012). “” Miss.Code Ann. § 47-7-5 (Rev. 2011). Similarly, an individual on probation is not “in custody” of MDOC but remains subject to the jurisdiction of the circuit court.”
Rochell v. State, 36 So. 3d 479 (Miss. Ct. App. 2010). “1996)); see Miss.Code Ann. § 47-7-5(3) (Supp.2009). Thus, an inmate has no absolute entitlement to parole.”
Haynes v. State, 811 So. 2d 283 (Miss. Ct. App. 2001). “The earning of good time can lead to early release on parole.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 47-7-5(1) — 1 case
In re Hooker, 87 So. 3d 401 (Miss. 2012). “Miss.Code Ann. § 47-7-5(1) (Rev. 2011). *431 ¶ 103.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 47-7-5(3) — 6 cases
Jones v. State, 122 So. 3d 698 (Miss. 2013). “at 598 (citing Miss.Code Ann. § 47-7-5 (Supp.1998)). The opinion noted that, while "certain statutes specify that a trial court may or must impose a sentence 'without the possibility of parole’ .”
Mangum v. Mississippi Parole Bd., 76 So. 3d 762 (Miss. Ct. App. 2011). “1996)); see Miss.Code Ann. § 47-7-5(3) (Supp.2009). Thus, an inmate has no absolute entitlement to parole.”
Cotton v. Mississippi Parole Bd., 863 So. 2d 917 (Miss. 2003). “The Court found that the Parole Board has exclusive authority to grant or deny parole under Miss.Code Ann. § 47-7-5 with absolute discretion.”
Carter v. State, 754 So. 2d 1207 (Miss. 2000). “See Miss.Code Ann. § 47-7-5(3) (Supp. 1990). Miss.”
Rochell v. State, 36 So. 3d 479 (Miss. Ct. App. 2010). “1996)); see Miss.Code Ann. § 47-7-5(3) (Supp.2009). Thus, an inmate has no absolute entitlement to parole.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 47-7-5(7) — 1 case
Pickle v. Mississippi State Parole Bd., 850 So. 2d 195 (Miss. Ct. App. 2003).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.