Mississippi Code
Miss. Code Ann. § 63-11-5 (2026)
Implied consent to chemical tests; administration of tests; warnings; form of traffic tickets, citations or affidavits; advice regarding right to request legal or medical assistance; rules and regulations
✓ current as of July 2026
- (1)
- (a) Any person who operates a motor vehicle upon the public highways, public roads or streets of this state shall be deemed to have given his consent, subject to the provisions of this chapter, to a chemical test or tests of his breath, blood or urine for the purpose of determining alcohol concentration. A person shall give his consent to a chemical test or tests of his breath, blood or urine for the purpose of determining the presence in his body of any other substance which would impair a person's ability to operate a motor vehicle.
- (b) The test or tests shall be administered at the direction of any authorized officer, when such officer has reasonable grounds and probable cause to believe that the person was driving or had under his actual physical control a motor vehicle upon the public streets or highways of this state while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or any other substance which had impaired such person's ability to operate a motor vehicle.
- (2)
- (a) A breath analysis test must be administered by a person who has met all the educational and training requirements of the appropriate course of study prescribed by the Board on Law Enforcement Officer Standards and Training; however, sheriffs and elected chiefs of police are exempt from the educational and training requirement. A breath analysis test must not be given to any person within fifteen (15) minutes of consumption of any substance by mouth.
- (b) For purposes of this section, the term "authorized officer" means any highway patrol officer, commercial motor carrier inspector, sheriff or his duly commissioned deputies, police officer in any incorporated municipality, national park ranger, officer of a state-supported institution of higher learning campus police force if such officer is exercising this authority in regard to a violation that occurred on campus property, or security officer appointed and commissioned pursuant to the Pearl River Valley Water Supply District Security Officer Law of 1978 if such officer is exercising this authority in regard to a violation that occurred within the limits of the Pearl River Valley Water Supply District.
- (3) If the officer has reasonable grounds and probable cause to believe such person to have been driving a motor vehicle upon the public highways, public roads or streets of this state while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or any other substance that has impaired the person's ability to operate a motor vehicle, the officer shall inform the person that his failure to submit to such chemical test or tests of his breath, blood or urine shall result in the suspension of his privilege to operate a motor vehicle upon the public streets , roads or highways of this state for a period of ninety (90) days if the person has not previously been convicted of a violation of Section 63-11-30, or for a period of one (1) year if the person has a prior conviction under Section 63-11-30.
- (4) The traffic ticket, citation or affidavit issued to a person arrested for a violation of this chapter shall conform to the requirements of Section 63-9-21(3)(b) and, if filed electronically, shall conform to Section 63-9-21(8).
- (5) Any person arrested under the provisions of this chapter shall be informed that he has the right to telephone for the purpose of requesting legal or medical assistance immediately after being booked for a violation under this chapter.
- (6) The Commissioner of Public Safety and the Mississippi Forensics Laboratory created pursuant to Section 45-1-17 are authorized to adopt procedures, rules and regulations applicable to the Implied Consent Law.
Codes, 1942, § 8175-09; Laws, 1971, ch. 515, § 9; Laws, 1981, ch. 491, § 1; Laws, 1983, ch. 466, § 2; Laws, 1988, ch. 568, § 1; Laws, 1991, ch. 480, § 4; Laws, 1991, ch. 577, § 1; Laws, 1992, ch. 525, § 1; Laws, 1993, ch. 354, § 1; Laws, 1996, ch. 527, § 4; Laws, 1998, ch. 551, § 1; Laws, 2012, ch. 550, § 2, eff. 7/1/2012.
Amended by Laws, 2024, ch. 400, HB 1015,§ 2, eff. 7/1/2024.
Amended by Laws, 2018, ch. 447, SB 2663,§ 4, eff. 7/1/2020.
Amended by Laws, 2016, ch. 376, HB 1361, 1, eff. 7/1/2016.
Amended by Laws, 2015, ch. 452, SB 2159, 13, eff. 7/1/2015.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 47
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1974–2021 · leading case: Williams v. State, 708 So. 2d 1358 (Miss. 1998).
Williams v. State, 708 So. 2d 1358 (Miss. 1998). “He argues that under Miss. Code Ann. § 63-11-5 (3) the traffic ticket issued to a person arrested for violation of the implied consent law shall conform to the requirements of Miss.”
Graham Warwick v. State of Mississippi, 179 So. 3d 1069 (Miss. 2015). “” Miss. Code Ann. § 63-11-5 (1) (Rev. 2013).”
Green v. State, 710 So. 2d 862 (Miss. 1998). “In Sheppard , this Court referred to Miss.Code Ann. § 63-11-5 and stated As a practical matter a driver has been stopped and usually brought to the jail, or other testing has occurred, before he is asked to submit to a sobriety test.”
McLendon v. State, 945 So. 2d 372 (Miss. 2006). “[6] Miss.Code Ann. § 63-11-5(2) (Rev.2004), provides for an automatic 90-day driver's license suspension upon a first offender's refusal to submit to the test.”
Smith v. State, 942 So. 2d 308 (Miss. Ct. App. 2006). “" Miss. Code Ann. § 63-11-5 (1) (Rev.2004).”
Fulton v. City of Starkville, 645 So. 2d 910 (Miss. 1994). “Miss. Code Ann. § 63-11-5 provides as follows: Any person who operates a motor vehicle upon the public highways, public roads and streets of this state shall be deemed to have given his consent, subject to provisions of this chapter, to a chemical test or test of his breath for…”
Fisher v. City of Eupora, 587 So. 2d 878 (Miss. 1991). “" Miss. Code Ann. § 63-11-5 (Rev. 1990) states that the test shall not "be given by any officer or any agency to any person within fifteen (15) minutes of consumption of any substance by mouth.”
Jonathan Albert Leal v. State, 452 S.W.3d 14 (Tex. App. 2014). “52 (Westlaw); Miss. Code Ann. §§ 63-11-5 , 63-11-8, 63-11-21 (Westlaw); Mo.”
Price v. State, 752 So. 2d 1070 (Miss. Ct. App. 1999). “Miss.Code Ann. § 63-11-5 (Rev. 1996) provides in part: "Any person who operates a motor vehicle upon the public highways, public roads and streets of this state shall be deemed to have given his consent, subject to the provisions of this chapter, to a chemical test or tests of…”
Edwards v. State, 795 So. 2d 554 (Miss. Ct. App. 2001). “" Miss.Code Ann. § 63-11-5(1) (Rev.2000). ¶ 34.”
Sheppard v. Miss. State High. Patrol, 693 So. 2d 1326 (Miss. 1997). “Miss. Code Ann. § 63-11-5 . (Probable cause required before officer may request the test.”
Wash v. State, 790 So. 2d 856 (Miss. Ct. App. 2001). “" Miss Code Ann. § 63-11-5(1) (Rev.2000). Nothing is mentioned about a time before which the test must be given.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 63-11-5(1) — 13 cases
Graham Warwick v. State of Mississippi, 179 So. 3d 1069 (Miss. 2015). “” Miss. Code Ann. § 63-11-5 (1) (Rev. 2013).”
Edwards v. State, 795 So. 2d 554 (Miss. Ct. App. 2001). “" Miss.Code Ann. § 63-11-5(1) (Rev.2000). ¶ 34.”
Wash v. State, 790 So. 2d 856 (Miss. Ct. App. 2001). “" Miss Code Ann. § 63-11-5(1) (Rev.2000). Nothing is mentioned about a time before which the test must be given.”
Dominick v. State, 108 So. 3d 452 (Miss. Ct. App. 2012).
Green v. State, 710 So. 2d 862 (Miss. 1998). “In Sheppard , this Court referred to Miss.Code Ann. § 63-11-5 and stated As a practical matter a driver has been stopped and usually brought to the jail, or other testing has occurred, before he is asked to submit to a sobriety test.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 63-11-5(2) — 3 cases
McLendon v. State, 945 So. 2d 372 (Miss. 2006). “[6] Miss.Code Ann. § 63-11-5(2) (Rev.2004), provides for an automatic 90-day driver's license suspension upon a first offender's refusal to submit to the test.”
Green v. State, 710 So. 2d 862 (Miss. 1998). “In Sheppard , this Court referred to Miss.Code Ann. § 63-11-5 and stated As a practical matter a driver has been stopped and usually brought to the jail, or other testing has occurred, before he is asked to submit to a sobriety test.”
Lavinghouse v. Miss. Hwy. Saf. Patrol, 620 So. 2d 971 (Miss. 1993).
— Miss. Code Ann. § 63-11-5(2)(a) — 1 case
Nikolas Johnson a/k/a Nikolas Leshawn Johnson v. State of Mississippi (Miss. Ct. App. 2021).
— Miss. Code Ann. § 63-11-5(3) — 1 case
Green v. State, 710 So. 2d 862 (Miss. 1998). “In Sheppard , this Court referred to Miss.Code Ann. § 63-11-5 and stated As a practical matter a driver has been stopped and usually brought to the jail, or other testing has occurred, before he is asked to submit to a sobriety test.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 63-11-5(4) — 2 cases
Smith v. State, 942 So. 2d 308 (Miss. Ct. App. 2006). “" Miss. Code Ann. § 63-11-5 (1) (Rev.2004).”
Case v. State, 817 So. 2d 605 (Miss. Ct. App. 2002).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.