Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 63-17-73 (2024)

Offenses and penalties

✓ Justia copy: laws through about 2024 (2025 and 2026 sessions missing)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Codes, 1942, § 8071.7-05; Laws, 1970, ch. 478, § 5; reenacted without change, Laws, 1983, ch. 344, § 12; reenacted without change, Laws, 1991, ch. 305, § 12; Laws, 1994, ch. 399, § 3; Laws, 2000, ch. 418, § 9; Laws, 2006, ch. 432, § 4, eff. 7/1/2006.

Amended by Laws, 2019, ch. 394, HB 872,§ 1, eff. 7/1/2019.

Amended by Laws, 2014, ch. 532, HB 742, 12, eff. 10/1/2014.

Amended by Laws, 2014, ch. 349, HB 581, 3, eff. 7/1/2014.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1987–2019 · leading case: Nissan North Am., Inc. v. Ann C. Tillman, 273 So. 3d 710 (Miss. 2019).
Nissan North Am., Inc. v. Ann C. Tillman, 273 So. 3d 710 (Miss. 2019). · cites it 6× “” Miss. Code Ann. § 63-17-73 (1)(d)(iii). The only defined sixty day notice period involving the termination of a dealership agreement is the minimum sixty days preceding the proposed termination date.”
Holman v. Howard Wilson Chrysler Jeep, Inc., 972 So. 2d 564 (Miss. 2008). · cites it 2× “Miss.Code Ann. § 63-17-73(1)(b)(2) (Rev. 2004).”
Hubbard Chevrolet Co., Cross-Appellant v. Gen. Motors Corp., Cross-Appellee, 873 F.2d 873 (5th Cir. 1989). “See Miss.Code Ann. §§ 63-17-73(1)(d), 63-17-55(16).”
Hubbard Chevrolet Co. v. Gen. Motors Corp., 682 F. Supp. 873 (S.D. Miss. 1987). · cites it 3× “§ 1221-1225 , that GM violated the analogous Mississippi Act, Miss.Code Ann. § 63-17-73 (1972), and that GM is liable for breach of fiduciary duty, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing and interference with prospective business relations.”
Hernandez v. Vickery Chevrolet-olds. Co., 652 So. 2d 179 (Miss. 1995). “See Miss. Code Ann. § 63-17-73 (1972 and Supp.”
Larry James Oldsmobile-Pontiac-GMC Truck Co. v. Gen. Motors Corp., 164 F.R.D. 428 (N.D. Miss. 1996). “Miss.Code Ann. § 63-17-73. GM claims that individual questions of fact predominate over issues common to the class because the coercion element necessarily entails individualized evidentiary determinations.”
Coye A. Holman v. Howard Wilson Chrysler Jeep, Inc., No. 2005-CT-01154-SCT (Miss. June 1, 2005). · cites it 2× “Miss. Code Ann. § 63-17-73 (1)(b)(2) (Rev.”
Miss. Code Ann. § 63-17-73(1)(b)(2): 1 case
Holman v. Howard Wilson Chrysler Jeep, Inc., 972 So. 2d 564 (Miss. 2008). “Miss.Code Ann. § 63-17-73(1)(b)(2) (Rev. 2004).”
Miss. Code Ann. § 63-17-73(1)(d): 1 case
Hubbard Chevrolet Co., Cross-Appellant v. Gen. Motors Corp., Cross-Appellee, 873 F.2d 873 (5th Cir. 1989). “See Miss.Code Ann. §§ 63-17-73(1)(d), 63-17-55(16).”
Miss. Code Ann. § 63-17-73(l)(d): 1 case
Hubbard Chevrolet Co. v. Gen. Motors Corp., 682 F. Supp. 873 (S.D. Miss. 1987). “§ 1221-1225 , that GM violated the analogous Mississippi Act, Miss.Code Ann. § 63-17-73 (1972), and that GM is liable for breach of fiduciary duty, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing and interference with prospective business relations.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.