Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 73-25-37 (2026)

Liability of physician, dentist, nurse, emergency medical technician, etc., for rendering emergency care; immunity from civil liability for good faith use of automated external defibrillator by person untrained in its use; immunity from civil liability for good faith use of auto-injectable epinephrine by trained school personnel

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Codes, 1942, § 8893.5; Laws, 1962, ch. 413; Laws, 1964, ch. 431; Laws, 1975, ch. 329; Laws, 1976, ch. 405; Laws, 1979, ch. 376, § 1; Laws, 1999, ch. 489, § 4; Laws, 2007, ch. 428, § 1, eff. 7/1/2007.

Amended by Laws, 2024, ch. 383, SB 2349,§ 3, eff. 7/1/2024.

Amended by Laws, 2015, ch. 423, SB 2485, 2, eff. 7/1/2015.

Amended by Laws, 2014, ch. 464, SB 2218, 2, eff. 7/1/2014.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1990–2018 · leading case: Carter v. Reese (Slip Opinion), 2016 Ohio 5569 (Ohio 2016).
Carter v. Reese (Slip Opinion), 2016 Ohio 5569 (Ohio 2016). · cites it 2× “01(2)(a) (“A person who * * * renders emergency care, advice, or assistance at the scene of an emergency * * * is not liable for any civil damages * * *”); Miss.Code Ann. 73-25-37(1) (“No duly licensed, practicing physician, physician assistant, dentist, * * * or any other…”
Little by Little v. Bell, 719 So. 2d 757 (Miss. 1998). “The Answer also asserted numerous defenses including failure to state a claim, superseding negligence of others, and immunity from suit pursuant to Miss.Code Ann. § 73-25-37 (1972). ¶ 4. On May 24, 1991, the Plaintiff/Appellant (Littles) amended their Complaint, adding an…”
Connie Hawkins v. Heck Yea Quarter Horses, LLC, 249 So. 3d 400 (Miss. 2018). · cites it 2× “Miss. Code Ann. § 73-25-37 (1) (Rev. 2017).”
Certification of a Question of Law, 2010 SD 16 (S.D. 2010). · cites it 2× “1502; Miss. Code Ann. 73-25-37; N.C.G.S.A. 90-21.”
Ladner v. Holleman, 90 So. 3d 655 (Miss. Ct. App. 2012). “Miss.Code Ann. § 73-25-37(1). ¶ 9. Ladner asserts the applicable duty of care owed is good faith and reasonable care standard under the Good Samaritan Statute and not the duty of care owed to licensees in premises-liability actions to refrain from willfully or wantonly injuring…”
Willard v. Vicksburg Mayor & Aldermen, 571 So. 2d 972 (Miss. 1990). “, practicing physician, dentist, registered nurse, licensed practical nurse, certified registered emergency medical technician, or any other person who, in good faith and in the exercise of reasonable care, renders emergency care to any injured person at the scene of an…”
Gronseth v. Chester Rural Fire Prot. Dist., 779 N.W.2d 158 (S.D. 2010). · cites it 2× “1502; Miss. Code Ann. 73-25-37; N.C.G.S.A. 90-21.”
William T. Brantley v. City of Horn Lake, Mississippi, 152 So. 3d 1106 (Miss. 2014). · cites it 2× “The MTCA does not contain a provision exempting governmental entities from liability from claims arising out of the provision of ambulance services.”
Andrea D. Little v. Larry Bell (Miss. 1992). “The Answer also asserted numerous defenses including failure to state a claim, superseding negligence of others, and immunity from suit pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. § 73-25-37 (1972). ¶4. On May 24, 1991, the Plaintiff/Appellant (Littles) amended their Complaint, adding an…”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 73-25-37(1) — 2 cases
Carter v. Reese (Slip Opinion), 2016 Ohio 5569 (Ohio 2016). “01(2)(a) (“A person who * * * renders emergency care, advice, or assistance at the scene of an emergency * * * is not liable for any civil damages * * *”); Miss.Code Ann. 73-25-37(1) (“No duly licensed, practicing physician, physician assistant, dentist, * * * or any other…”
Ladner v. Holleman, 90 So. 3d 655 (Miss. Ct. App. 2012). “Miss.Code Ann. § 73-25-37(1). ¶ 9. Ladner asserts the applicable duty of care owed is good faith and reasonable care standard under the Good Samaritan Statute and not the duty of care owed to licensees in premises-liability actions to refrain from willfully or wantonly injuring…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.