Mississippi Code
Miss. Code Ann. § 73-25-95 (2024)
Appeals
✓ Justia copy: laws through about 2024 (2025 and 2026 sessions missing)
Any person against whom disciplinary action is taken pursuant to Sections 73-25-81 through 73-25-95 shall have the right of judicial appeal as provided in Section 73-25-27 relating to judicial appeal of board decisions. Provided, further, that no such person shall be allowed to practice medicine or deliver health care services in violation of any disciplinary order or action of the board while any such appeal is pending.
Laws, 1977, ch. 412, § 8, eff. 3/29/1977.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1989–2004 · leading case: Sidney Wong v. John Stripling, Etc., 881 F.2d 200 (5th Cir. 1989).
Sidney Wong v. John Stripling, Etc., 881 F.2d 200 (5th Cir. 1989). “Pursuant to Miss.Code Ann. § 73-25-95, Dr. Wong filed a complaint in the Chancery Court of Harrison County to secure judicial review of the hospital’s decision.”
Curtis W. Caine, Jr., M.D. v. M.D. Hardy, M.D., 943 F.2d 1406 (5th Cir. 1991). “See Miss.Code Ann. § 73-25-95 (incorporating id.”
Warnick v. Natchez Cmty. Hosp., Inc., 904 So. 2d 1019 (Miss. 2004). “See Miss.Code Ann. § 73-25-93. In addition, Miss.”
Caine v. Hardy, 715 F. Supp. 166 (S.D. Miss. 1989). “Aggrieved physicians are provided a right of judicial appeal from adverse privilege actions by virtue of Miss.Code Ann. § 73-25-95 which provides: Any person against whom disciplinary action is taken pursuant to Sections 73-25-81 to 73-25-95 shall have the right to judicial…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.