Miss. Code Ann. § 75-26-15
Application of provisions to other laws, actions or proceedings
- (1) Except as provided in subsection (2), this chapter displaces conflicting tort, restitutionary and other law of this state providing civil remedies for misappropriation of a trade secret.
- (2) This chapter does not affect:
- (a) Contractual remedies, whether or not based upon misappropriation of a trade secret;
- (b) Other civil remedies that are not based upon misappropriation of a trade secret; or
- (c) Criminal remedies, whether or not based upon misappropriation of a trade secret.
Laws, 1990, ch. 442, § 8, eff. 7/1/1990.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1996–2022 · leading case: Fred's Stores of Miss. v. M & H DRUGS
Fred's Stores of Miss. v. M & H DRUGS (1998)
“Miss.Code Ann. § 75-26-15 (1991). That section states: (1) Except as provided in subsection (2), this chapter displaces conflicting tort, restitutionary and other law of this state providing civil remedies for misappropriation of a trade secret.”
New South Equipment Mats, LLC v. Keener (2013)
“” Miss.Code Ann. § 75-26-15(1). However, the Act’s preemptive reach does not extend to “[o]ther civil remedies that are not based upon misappropriation of a trade secret____” Id.”
Fred's Stores of MS Inc v. M & H Drugs Inc (1996)
“Miss. Code Ann. § 75-26-15 (1991). That section states: (1) Except as provided in subsection (2), this chapter displaces conflicting tort, restitutionary and other law of this state providing civil remedies for misappropriation of a trade secret.”
Enhanced Environmental & Emergency Services, Inc. v. Delashmit (2022)
“" Miss. Code Ann. § 75-26-3 . The MUTSA “displaces conflicting tort, restitutionary and other law of this state providing civil remedies for misappropriation of a trade secret.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 75-26-15(1) — 1 case
New South Equipment Mats, LLC v. Keener (2013)
“” Miss.Code Ann. § 75-26-15(1). However, the Act’s preemptive reach does not extend to “[o]ther civil remedies that are not based upon misappropriation of a trade secret____” Id.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.