Miss. Code Ann. » Miss. Code Ann. / Title 75 / Chapter 26
Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 75-26-15 (2026)

Application of provisions to other laws, actions or proceedings

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Laws, 1990, ch. 442, § 8, eff. 7/1/1990.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1996–2022 · leading case: Fred's Stores of Miss. v. M & H DRUGS, 725 So. 2d 902 (Miss. 1998).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Fred's Stores of Miss. v. M & H DRUGS, 725 So. 2d 902 (Miss. 1998). · cites it 6× “Miss.Code Ann. § 75-26-15 (1991). That section states: (1) Except as provided in subsection (2), this chapter displaces conflicting tort, restitutionary and other law of this state providing civil remedies for misappropriation of a trade secret.”
New South Equip. Mats, LLC v. Keener, 989 F. Supp. 2d 522 (S.D. Miss. 2013). · cites it 2× “” Miss.Code Ann. § 75-26-15(1). However, the Act’s preemptive reach does not extend to “[o]ther civil remedies that are not based upon misappropriation of a trade secret____” Id.”
Fred's Stores of MS Inc v. M & H Drugs Inc (Miss. 1996). · cites it 6× “Miss. Code Ann. § 75-26-15 (1991). That section states: (1) Except as provided in subsection (2), this chapter displaces conflicting tort, restitutionary and other law of this state providing civil remedies for misappropriation of a trade secret.”
Enhanced Env't & Emergency Servs., Inc. v. Delashmit (N.D. Miss. 2022). · cites it 2× “" Miss. Code Ann. § 75-26-3 . The MUTSA “displaces conflicting tort, restitutionary and other law of this state providing civil remedies for misappropriation of a trade secret.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 75-26-15(1) — 1 case
New South Equip. Mats, LLC v. Keener, 989 F. Supp. 2d 522 (S.D. Miss. 2013). “” Miss.Code Ann. § 75-26-15(1). However, the Act’s preemptive reach does not extend to “[o]ther civil remedies that are not based upon misappropriation of a trade secret____” Id.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.