Mississippi Code
Miss. Code Ann. § 75-9-101 (2026)
Short title
✓ current as of July 2026
This article may be cited as Uniform Commercial Code - Secured Transactions.
Laws, 2001, ch. 495, § 1, eff. 1/1/2002.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1983–1995 · leading case: Dungan v. Dick Moore, Inc., 463 So. 2d 1094 (Miss. 1985).
Dungan v. Dick Moore, Inc., 463 So. 2d 1094 (Miss. 1985). “Miss. Code Ann. §§ 75-9-101 et seq. (1972).”
Murray v. Payne, 437 So. 2d 47 (Miss. 1983). “[6] Miss. Code Ann. §§ 75-9-101 , et seq. (Supp.”
In the Matter of Heard Fam. Trucking, Inc., Debtor. Orix Credit All., Inc. v. Heard Fam. Trucking, Inc., & J.C. Bell, Jr., 41 F.3d 1027 (5th Cir. 1995). “As the court found that the provisions of the Motor Vehicle Titles chapter did not apply, the Mississippi perfection provisions of its Uniform Commercial Code, Miss. Code Ann. § 75-9-101 et seq. (1981 & Supp.”
Bank of Crystal Springs v. First Nat. Bank, 427 So. 2d 968 (Miss. 1983). “The appellant further contends the right to the funds represented by the certificate of deposit should not be determined by § 75-13-1 but rather in accordance with Miss. Code Ann. § 75-9-101 et seq. (1972).”
South Mississippi Fin. Co. v. Mississippi State Tax Comm'n, 605 So. 2d 736 (Miss. 1992). “Miss.Code Ann. §§ 75-9-101, et seq. (1972).”
Orix Credit All., Inc. v. Heard Fam. Trucking, Inc., 177 B.R. 68 (S.D. Miss. 1994). “However, having concluded that the security interest in question is not subject to this chapter, the court looks to the perfection provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code, codified at Miss. Code Ann. § 75-9-101 et seq. The relevant provision of that chapter provides: (2)…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.