Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 83-2-7 (2026)

Filing of rates and related information by insurers; exceptions; effective date of rate adjustment filing; exemption of certain commercial lines insurance coverages from filing and approval requirements

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Laws, 1987, ch. 422, § 5; Laws, 2010, ch. 311, § 1, eff. 7/1/2010.

Amended by Laws, 2020, ch. 447, HB 773,§ 1, eff. 7/1/2020.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2001–2007 · leading case: Leonard v. Nationwide Mut. Ins., 499 F.3d 419 (5th Cir. 2007).
Leonard v. Nationwide Mut. Ins., 499 F.3d 419 (5th Cir. 2007). “See Miss.Code Ann, § 83-2-7(1). The state Insurance Commissioner must reject any rate or policy form that contains “inconsistent, ambiguous, or misleading clauses or exceptions.”
Sandwich Chef of Texas, Inc. v. Reliance Nat'l Indem. Ins., 202 F.R.D. 484 (S.D. Tex. 2001). · cites it 2× “56 (West 1999); Miss.Code Ann. § 83-2-7 (1999); Mo.Ann. Stat.”
Blakely v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 406 F.3d 747 (5th Cir. 2005). “Miss. Code Ann. § 83-2-7 (1999). We find no pronouncement by Mississippi, either legislative or judicial, requiring that diminished value be a part of all automobile insurance policies.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 83-2-7(1) — 1 case
Leonard v. Nationwide Mut. Ins., 499 F.3d 419 (5th Cir. 2007). “See Miss.Code Ann, § 83-2-7(1). The state Insurance Commissioner must reject any rate or policy form that contains “inconsistent, ambiguous, or misleading clauses or exceptions.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.