Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 97-3-70 (2024)

[Repealed]

✓ Justia copy: laws through about 2024 (2025 and 2026 sessions missing)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Repealed by Laws, 1991, ch. 573, § 141, eff. 7/1/1991.

Laws, 1977, ch. 438, § 2.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1984–1994 · leading case: Heflin v. State, 643 So. 2d 512 (Miss. 1994).
Heflin v. State, 643 So. 2d 512 (Miss. 1994). · cites it 4× “" Miss. Code Ann. § 97-3-70 (4) (Supp. 1988).”
Goss v. State, 465 So. 2d 1079 (Miss. 1985). · cites it 4× “DID THE TRIAL COURT ERR IN EXCLUDING EVIDENCE OF THE PRIOR SEXUAL CONDUCT OF THE PROSECUTRIX? Lester Goss moved the court to allow evidence of the sexual conduct of the prosecutrix at trial under the so-called rape shield statute, Mississippi Code Annotated § 97-3-70 (Supp.…”
White v. State, 498 So. 2d 368 (Miss. 1986). “Appellant argues his right to cross examine on the issue under MCA § 97-3-70 (1977) which permits such question where the prosecution introduces testimony or evidence relating to the complaining witness' sexual conduct.”
Johnston v. Pittman, 731 F.2d 1231 (5th Cir. 1984). “Because Johnston did not seek to use the evidence to prove consent, the rape shield statute, Miss.Code Ann. § 97-3-70 (1972 & Supp.1983), is inapplicable.”
Miss. Code Ann. § 97-3-70(1): 1 case
Goss v. State, 465 So. 2d 1079 (Miss. 1985). “DID THE TRIAL COURT ERR IN EXCLUDING EVIDENCE OF THE PRIOR SEXUAL CONDUCT OF THE PROSECUTRIX? Lester Goss moved the court to allow evidence of the sexual conduct of the prosecutrix at trial under the so-called rape shield statute, Mississippi Code Annotated § 97-3-70 (Supp.…”
Miss. Code Ann. § 97-3-70(5): 1 case
Goss v. State, 465 So. 2d 1079 (Miss. 1985). “DID THE TRIAL COURT ERR IN EXCLUDING EVIDENCE OF THE PRIOR SEXUAL CONDUCT OF THE PROSECUTRIX? Lester Goss moved the court to allow evidence of the sexual conduct of the prosecutrix at trial under the so-called rape shield statute, Mississippi Code Annotated § 97-3-70 (Supp.…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.