Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 97-33-19 (2024)

Gambling; money and appliances forfeited; penalty for resisting seizure

✓ Justia copy: laws through about 2024 (2025 and 2026 sessions missing)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Any person or persons who shall oppose the seizure of any such moneys or appliances by any officer or person so authorized to make it, shall, on conviction thereof, be liable to a penalty of fifteen hundred dollars; and any person who shall take any part of said money, after the said seizure shall be declared, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction thereof, shall be fined and imprisoned, at the discretion of the court.

Codes, Hutchinson's 1848, ch. 64, art. 3(10); 1857, ch. 64, art. 140; 1871, § 2604; 1880, § 2850; 1892, § 1128; 1906, § 1210; Hemingway's 1917, § 940; 1930, § 967; 1942, § 2197.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1992–1995 · leading case: Harold Wayne Enlow v. Tishomingo Cnty., 962 F.2d 501 (5th Cir. 1992).
Harold Wayne Enlow v. Tishomingo Cnty., 962 F.2d 501 (5th Cir. 1992). “Miss.Code Ann. § 97-33-19 (1972). 7 .Enlow’s deposition describes the arrest as follows: [The Sheriff] shook his finger in my face and said I told you, damn it, to stay out of this, you’re under arrest for interfering with a raid.”
Enlow v. Tishomingo Cnty., 45 F.3d 885 (5th Cir. 1995). “Miss.Code Ann. § 97-33-19. . The bond fee statute, at the time of Enlow's arrest, read as follows: Upon every defendant charged with a criminal offense who posts a cash bail bond, a surety bail bond or property bail bond conditioned for his appearance at trial, there is hereby…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.