Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 97-37-5 (2026)

Unlawful for convicted felon to possess any firearms, or other weapons or devices; penalties; exceptions

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Codes, 1880, § 2985; 1892, § 1026; 1906, § 1103; Hemingway's 1917, § 829; 1930, § 853; 1942, § 2079; Laws, 1898, p. 86; Laws, 1960, ch. 242, § 1; Laws, 1962, ch. 310, § 1; Laws, 1993, ch. 482, § 1; Laws, 2007, ch. 322, § 1; Laws, 2007, ch. 530, § 2, eff. 7/1/2007.

Amended by Laws, 2021, ch. 430, HB 928,§ 4, eff. 7/1/2021.

Amended by Laws, 2013, ch. 384, SB 2647, 3, eff. 7/1/2013.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 88 cases (17 in the last 5 years), 1995–2026 · leading case: James v. State, 731 So. 2d 1135 (Miss. 1999).
James v. State, 731 So. 2d 1135 (Miss. 1999). · cites it 10× “James challenges the validity of his conviction under Miss.Code Ann. § 97-37-5, which prohibits convicted felons from possessing firearms.”
Evans v. State, 813 So. 2d 724 (Miss. 2002). · cites it 5× “357 magnum which was loaded with six rounds of ammunition. Evans was a convicted felon at that time.”
Verenzo Cartrell Green v. State of Mississippi, 183 So. 3d 28 (Miss. 2016). · cites it 2× “Miss. Code Ann. § 97-37-5 (1) (Rev. 2014).”
Johnson v. State, 94 So. 3d 1209 (Miss. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 3× “” Miss.Code Ann. § 97-37-5(1) (Supp.2011) (emphasis added).”
Hicks v. State, 973 So. 2d 211 (Miss. 2007). · cites it 3× “See Miss.Code Ann. § 97-37-5 (Rev.2006). While this Court has not considered this issue, the Court of Appeals specifically addressed this same question from a different perspective in Estes v.”
United States v. Juan Castillo-Rivera, 853 F.3d 218 (5th Cir. 2017). “§ 97-3-13 , Malicious Confinement as Mentally Ill, is a felony which "It shall be unlawful for any person who has been carries a penalty of not more than a year in the 19 Mississippi Miss. Code Ann. § 97-37-5 convicted of a felony under the laws of this state" penitentiary Neb…”
Davis v. State, 18 So. 3d 842 (Miss. 2009). “Miss.Code Ann. § 97-37-5(1) (Rev.2006) (emphasis added).”
Gilmore v. State, 119 So. 3d 278 (Miss. 2013). “” Miss.Code Ann. § 97-37-5 (Rev.2006). Because Gilmore stipulated that he was a convicted felon who was not able to possess a firearm lawfully, the State needed only to prove that Gilmore had “willfully possessed a firearm.”
Williams v. State, 971 So. 2d 581 (Miss. 2007). “Miss.Code Ann. § 97-37-5 (Rev.2006). ¶ 15.”
William Michael Jordan v. State of Mississippi, 212 So. 3d 836 (Miss. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 3× “2008); Miss. Code Ann. § 97-37-5 . Both Smith and Baker testified Jordan went to his bedroom to retrieve a shotgun, which he proceeded to wave around.”
Reginald Jackson v. State of Mississippi, 174 So. 3d 232 (Miss. 2015). “…knife, butcher knife, switchblade knife, metallic knuckles, blackjack, or any muffler or silencer for any firearm.... Miss.Code Ann. § 97-37-5 (Rev.2014).”
Miss. Com'n of Jud. Perform. v. Russell, 691 So. 2d 929 (Miss. 1997). · cites it 2× “Kemp's parole was revoked after Mike LaRue, Kemp's parole officer, substantiated reports that Kemp had been using alcohol and was in possession of firearms in violation of Miss. Code Ann. § 97-37-5 (1972). Despite the revocation by the Parole Board, Judge Russell entered an…”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 97-37-5(1) — 13 cases
Johnson v. State, 94 So. 3d 1209 (Miss. Ct. App. 2011). “” Miss.Code Ann. § 97-37-5(1) (Supp.2011) (emphasis added).”
Verenzo Cartrell Green v. State of Mississippi, 183 So. 3d 28 (Miss. 2016). “Miss. Code Ann. § 97-37-5 (1) (Rev. 2014).”
Davis v. State, 18 So. 3d 842 (Miss. 2009). “Miss.Code Ann. § 97-37-5(1) (Rev.2006) (emphasis added).”
State v. Thacker, 2024 Ohio 5835 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
Short v. State, 929 So. 2d 420 (Miss. Ct. App. 2006).
— Miss. Code Ann. § 97-37-5(1)(1994) — 1 case
James v. State, 731 So. 2d 1135 (Miss. 1999). “James challenges the validity of his conviction under Miss.Code Ann. § 97-37-5, which prohibits convicted felons from possessing firearms.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 97-37-5(2) — 1 case
Sawyer v. State, 2 So. 3d 655 (Miss. Ct. App. 2008).
— Miss. Code Ann. § 97-37-5(3) — 2 cases
State v. Masangkay, 121 Wash. App. 904 (Wash. Ct. App. 2004).
State v. Masangkay, 91 P.3d 140 (Wash. Ct. App. 2004).
— Miss. Code Ann. § 97-37-5(c) — 2 cases
Hicks v. State, 973 So. 2d 211 (Miss. 2007). “See Miss.Code Ann. § 97-37-5 (Rev.2006). While this Court has not considered this issue, the Court of Appeals specifically addressed this same question from a different perspective in Estes v.”
Estes v. State, 782 So. 2d 1244 (Miss. Ct. App. 2000).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.