Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 99-17-7 (2024)

Interpreters

✓ Justia copy: laws through about 2024 (2025 and 2026 sessions missing)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In all criminal cases wherein the defendant is a Limited English Proficient (LEP) individual, the court shall appoint a qualified interpreter as provided in Section 9-21-80, sworn truly to interpret, and allow him a reasonable compensation, as set by the court, payable out of the county or municipal treasury at no cost to the defendant.

Codes, Hutchinson's 1848, ch. 61, art. 1(80); 1857, ch. 61, art. 158; 1871, § 640; 1880, § 1713; 1892, § 731; 1906, § 792; Hemingway's 1917, § 576; 1930, § 585; 1942, § 1529; Laws, 2000, ch. 389, § 1; Laws, 2006, ch. 569, § 7, eff. 7/1/2006.

Amended by Laws, 2023, ch. 355, HB 1217,§ 7, eff. 7/1/2023.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1986–2023 · leading case: Arteigapiloto v. State, 496 So. 2d 681 (Miss. 1986).
Arteigapiloto v. State, 496 So. 2d 681 (Miss. 1986). · cites it 2× “In criminal cases, language interpreters are allowed, when necessary, by Miss. Code Ann. § 99-17-7 (1972).”
Castro v. State, 159 So. 3d 1217 (Miss. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “According to Mississippi Code Annotated section 99-17-7 (Rev.2007), “In criminal cases wherein the defendant has been declared indigent, the court may appoint an interpreter who is certified as provided in Section 9-21-73, when necessary, sworn truly to interpret.”
Gustavo P. Galvan v. State of Mississippi, 385 So. 3d 471 (Miss. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 2× “In addition, at the time of Galvan’s trial, Mississippi Code Annotated section 99-17-7 (Rev. 2020), provided that “when necessary,” a court could appoint an 4 to participate in a trial and assist his attorney is a factual determination.”
Rice v. State, 824 So. 2d 636 (Miss. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “Miss.Code Ann. § 99-17-7 (Rev.2000). Rice was also indicted and convicted for the crime of kidnaping which is defined by statute: Any person who shall without lawful authority forcibly seize and confine any other person, or shall inveigle or kidnap any other person with intent…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.