Mo. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 163
Missouri Revised Statutes

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 163.091 (2026)

Correction of errors in apportionment of state aid

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

  163.091.  Correction of errors in apportionment of state aid. — The state board of education may correct any error made in the apportionment of the state school moneys fund and classroom trust fund among the various districts of this state out of the state school moneys fund and classroom trust fund of the year next following the date when the mistake was made.  The state board of education shall certify the amount set apart to any school district for the purpose of correcting any error to the commissioner of administration, and the commissioner of administration shall certify the amount so apportioned for proper payment, and the district treasurer shall credit the funds as the funds of the year in which the error occurred.  If any district has received funds in excess of the amount to which it was entitled, its apportionment for the next succeeding year shall be reduced accordingly.

­­--------

(L. 1963 p. 200 § 4-9, A.L. 1977 H.B. 130, S.B. 82, A.L. 2005 S.B. 287)

(Source: RSMo 1959 § 161.080)

Effective 7-01-06

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1983–2000 · leading case: Green v. Lebanon R-III Sch. Dist., 13 S.W.3d 278 (Mo. 2000).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Green v. Lebanon R-III Sch. Dist., 13 S.W.3d 278 (Mo. 2000). · cites it 6× “Section 163.091, RSMo 1994. State aid payments are final for the year in which they are paid, as penalties and other adjustments are to be paid in the next school year.”
State Ex Rel. Sch. Dist. of Indep. v. Jones, 653 S.W.2d 178 (Mo. 1983). · cites it 4× “Section 163.091 provides some relief to school districts aggrieved by erroneous ap-portionments: 163.”
Rolla 31 Sch. Dist. v. State, 837 S.W.2d 1 (Mo. 1992). · cites it 2× “The school districts likewise have not demonstrated any basis in law for the recovery of their attorneys fees.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.