Missouri Revised Statutes
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 195.005 (2026)
Comprehensive drug control act
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
195.005. Comprehensive drug control act. — This chapter and chapter 579 shall be known as the "Comprehensive Drug Control Act".
--------
(L. 1989 S.B. 215 & 58, A.L. 2014 S.B. 491)
Effective 1-01-17
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 71
cases, 1990–2019 · leading case: State v. Todd, 70 S.W.3d 509 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002).
State v. Todd, 70 S.W.3d 509 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002). “400, or reagents, or solvents, or any other chemical proven to be precursor ingredients of methamphetamine or amphetamine, as established by expert testimony pursuant to subsection 3 of this section, with the intent to manufacture, compound, convert, produce, process, prepare,…”
State v. Blocker, 133 S.W.3d 502 (Mo. 2004). “1 provides, in relevant part, that: A person may lawfully possess or have under his control a controlled substance if such person obtained the controlled substance directly from, or pursuant to, a valid prescription or order of a practitioner while acting in the course of a…”
State v. Polson, 145 S.W.3d 881 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004). “olvents, or any other chemicals proven to be precursor ingredients of methamphetamine or amphetamine, as established by expert testimony pursuant to subsection 3 of this section, with the intent to manufacture, compound, convert, produce, process, prepare, test, or otherwise…”
State v. Mickle, 164 S.W.3d 33 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005). “for any person to use, or to possess with intent to use, drug paraphernalia to plant, propagate, cultivate, grow, harvest, manufacture, compound, convert, produce, process, prepare, test, analyze, pack, repack, store, contain, conceal, inject, ingest, inhale, or otherwise…”
Tilley v. State, 202 S.W.3d 726 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006). “with the intent to manufacture, compound, convert, produce, process, prepare, test, or otherwise alter that chemical to create a controlled substance or a controlled substance analogue in violation of sections 195.005 to 195.425. To convict on a charge of possession of a…”
State v. Carson, 941 S.W.2d 518 (Mo. 1997). “The Act was truly comprehensive, rewriting almost all of Chapter 195.”
State v. Harris, 153 S.W.3d 4 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005). “Except as authorized by sections 195.005 to 195.425 and except as provided in section 195.”
State v. Elmore, 43 S.W.3d 421 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001). “in violation of sections 195.005 to 195.425." § 195.010(17), RSMo Cum.”
State v. Davis, 219 S.W.3d 863 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007). “1 states “[e]xcept as authorized by sections 195.005 to 195.425, it is unlawful for any person to possess or have under his control a controlled substance.”
State v. Farris, 125 S.W.3d 382 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004). “1 provides: Except as authorized by sections 195.005 to 195.425 and except as provided in section 195.”
State v. Neel, 81 S.W.3d 86 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002). “solvents, or any other chemical proven to be precursor ingredients of methamphetamine or amphetamine, as established by expert testimony pursuant to subsection 3 of this section, with the intent to manufacture, compound, convert, produce, process, prepare, test, or otherwise…”
Spells v. State, 277 S.W.3d 343 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009). “8 says: A person commits the crime of trafficking drugs in the first degree if, except as authorized by sections 195.005 to 195.425, he distributes, delivers, manufactures, produces or attempts to distribute, deliver, manufacture or produce more than thirty grams of any…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.