Missouri Revised Statutes

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 21.750 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

  *21.750.  Firearms legislation preemption by general assembly, exceptions — limitation on civil recovery against firearms or ammunitions manufacturers, when, exception. — 1.  The general assembly hereby occupies and preempts the entire field of legislation touching in any way firearms, components, ammunition and supplies to the complete exclusion of any order, ordinance or regulation by any political subdivision of this state.  Any existing or future orders, ordinances or regulations in this field are hereby and shall be null and void except as provided in subsection 3 of this section.

  2.  No county, city, town, village, municipality, or other political subdivision of this state shall adopt any order, ordinance or regulation concerning in any way the sale, purchase, purchase delay, transfer, ownership, use, keeping, possession, bearing, transportation, licensing, permit, registration, taxation other than sales and compensating use taxes or other controls on firearms, components, ammunition, and supplies except as provided in subsection 3 of this section.

  3.  (1)  Except as provided in subdivision (2) of this subsection, nothing contained in this section shall prohibit any ordinance of any political subdivision which conforms exactly with any of the provisions of sections 571.010 to 571.070, with appropriate penalty provisions, or which regulates the open carrying of firearms readily capable of lethal use or the discharge of firearms within a jurisdiction, provided such ordinance complies with the provisions of section 252.243.  No ordinance shall be construed to preclude the use of a firearm in the defense of person or property, subject to the provisions of chapter 563.

  (2)  In any jurisdiction in which the open carrying of firearms is prohibited by ordinance, the open carrying of firearms shall not be prohibited in accordance with the following:

  (a)  Any person with a valid concealed carry endorsement or permit who is open carrying a firearm shall be required to have a valid concealed carry endorsement or permit from this state, or a permit from another state that is recognized by this state, in his or her possession at all times;

  (b)  Any person open carrying a firearm in such jurisdiction shall display his or her concealed carry endorsement or permit upon demand of a law enforcement officer;

  (c)  In the absence of any reasonable and articulable suspicion of criminal activity, no person carrying a concealed or unconcealed firearm shall be disarmed or physically restrained by a law enforcement officer unless under arrest; and

  (d)  Any person who violates this subdivision shall be subject to the penalty provided in section 571.121.

  4.  The lawful design, marketing, manufacture, distribution, or sale of firearms or ammunition to the public is not an abnormally dangerous activity and does not constitute a public or private nuisance.

  5.  No county, city, town, village or any other political subdivision nor the state shall bring suit or have any right to recover against any firearms or ammunition manufacturer, trade association or dealer for damages, abatement or injunctive relief resulting from or relating to the lawful design, manufacture, marketing, distribution, or sale of firearms or ammunition to the public.  This subsection shall apply to any suit pending as of October 12, 2003, as well as any suit which may be brought in the future.  Provided, however, that nothing in this section shall restrict the rights of individual citizens to recover for injury or death caused by the negligent or defective design or manufacture of firearms or ammunition.

  6.  Nothing in this section shall prevent the state, a county, city, town, village or any other political subdivision from bringing an action against a firearms or ammunition manufacturer or dealer for breach of contract or warranty as to firearms or ammunition purchased by the state or such political subdivision.

­­--------

(L. 1984 H.B. 928 § 1, A.L. 2003 S.B. 13, A.L. 2007 S.B. 225, A.L. 2014 S.B. 656)

*Effective 10-10-14, see § 21.250.  S.B. 656 was vetoed July 14, 2014. The veto was overridden on September 10, 2014.

(1994) City may enact ordinance regulating carrying of firearm capable of lethal use.  City of Cape Girardeau v. Joyce, 884 S.W.2d 33 (Mo.App. E.D.).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1994–2018 · leading case: Zoological Park Subdistrict of the Metro. Park Museum Dist. v. Smith, 561 S.W.3d 893 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).
Zoological Park Subdistrict of the Metro. Park Museum Dist. v. Smith, 561 S.W.3d 893 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 24× “Smith's argument ignores the plain language of Section 21.750 and the basic tenets of statutory construction.”
Wellman v. St. Louis Cnty., 255 F. Supp. 3d 896 (E.D. Mo. 2017). · cites it 7× “Violation of Mo. Rev. Stat. § 21.750 Finally, Wellman claims that Mo.”
City of St. Louis v. Cernicek, 145 S.W.3d 37 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 15× “As a threshold matter, we will first determine whether the City’s claim is barred by Section 21.750 RSMo (Supp.2003). 2 This statute was amended to add subsections 4-6 to the existent subsections 1-3, and the amended subsections became effective October 12, 2003, three days…”
City of Cape Girardeau v. Joyce, 884 S.W.2d 33 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 3× “Joyce argues that Section 21.750 RSMo.1986 is unconstitutional, his appeal is from a conviction of an ordinance violation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.