Mo. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 226
Missouri Revised Statutes

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 226.007 (2026)

Transfer of agencies

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

  226.007.  Transfer of agencies. — 1.  The Missouri-St. Louis Metropolitan Airport Authority, chapter 305, the Bi-State Development Agency of the Missouri-Illinois Metropolitan District, as authorized by section 70.370, the Kansas City Area Transportation Authority District, as authorized by chapter 238, are assigned to the department of transportation.

  2.  All the powers, duties and functions vested in the aviation section, commerce and industrial development division, chapter 305, and others, are transferred by type I transfer to the transportation department.

­­--------

(L. 1973 1st Ex. Sess. S.B. 1 § 14, A.L. 1995 H.B. 574)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1991–1998 · leading case: Martin v. Missouri High. & Transp. Dep't, 981 S.W.2d 577 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Martin v. Missouri High. & Transp. Dep't, 981 S.W.2d 577 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998). “At the time the suit was filed, the highway department for the state of Missouri was the Missouri Highway and Transportation Department. Subsequently, that name was changed to the Missouri Department of Transportation (Mo-DOT), which is administered by the Missouri Highway and…”
Walker v. Bi-State Dev. Agency of the Missouri-Illinois Metro. Dist., 763 F. Supp. 409 (E.D. Mo. 1991). “§ 226.007(2). An analysis of the second and third factors, the method of the agency’s funding and whether the state is financially responsible for liabilities incurred, also gives mixed signals in characterizing Bi-State.”
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 226.007(2): 1 case
Walker v. Bi-State Dev. Agency of the Missouri-Illinois Metro. Dist., 763 F. Supp. 409 (E.D. Mo. 1991). “§ 226.007(2). An analysis of the second and third factors, the method of the agency’s funding and whether the state is financially responsible for liabilities incurred, also gives mixed signals in characterizing Bi-State.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.