Missouri Revised Statutes
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 3.020 (2026)
Contents
✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
3.020. Contents. — The editions of the revised statutes hereby authorized shall contain:
(1) The Constitution of the United States;
(2) The constitution of this state;
(3) All statute laws of a general nature which are in force in the state of Missouri, including all general acts passed by the general assembly during its 1959 regular session;
(4) A full and accurate index of the statute laws and constitution of this state; and
(5) Such annotations, historical notes, supreme court rules and other information as the committee deems appropriate to include.
--------
(L. 1949 p. 545 § 3.02, A.L. 1959 S.B. 88)
CROSS REFERENCES:
Departmental organization plans to be published, Reorganization Act of 1974, Appendix B, RSMo 1978
Reorganization of executive agencies, 26.530
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases, 1955–1997 · leading case: State v. Metro. St. Louis Sewer Dist., 275 S.W.2d 225 (Mo. 1955).
State v. Metro. St. Louis Sewer Dist., 275 S.W.2d 225 (Mo. 1955). “020(6) of the plan; (2) Unlimited borrowing authorized by Section 3.020(13); (3) The bonding of the District, authorized by Section 3.”
Beatty v. Metro. St. Louis Sewer Dist., 731 S.W.2d 318 (Mo. Ct. App. 1987). “Nothing in the majority opinion will prevent MSD from financing long-range district-wide improvements with revenue bonds. They may do so by submitting district-wide projects to all voters in the district and subdistrict projects to voters within the affected subdistrict.”
Metro. St. Louis Sewer Dist. v. Zykan, 495 S.W.2d 643 (Mo. 1973). “No proof of water pollution necessary to invocation of the District’s power under Section 3.020 of its Charter, and no proof that the District had taken action necessary to exercise control over the creek under Section 3.”
St. Louis Inv. Props., Inc. v. Metro. St. Louis Sewer Dist., 873 S.W.2d 303 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994). “Section 3.020(1). The Plan provides that “[t]he powers of the District shall be exercised in the manner prescribed in this Plan, or, if not prescribed herein, in such manner as may be prescribed by the Board.”
In re the City of St. Louis, 363 S.W.2d 612 (Mo. 1963). “Louis Sewer District, pursuant to Section 3.020(7 and 8) of Article 3 of the plan of the Metropolitan St.”
Missouri Growth Ass'n v. Metro. St. Louis Sewer Dist., 941 S.W.2d 615 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997). “9029, however, a user of non-metered residential property may request the installation of a meter. Furthermore, these two methods of measuring wastewater usage for metered and non-metered customers have both been specifically approved by the voters in MSD’s Charter (Plan),…”
E. Missouri Laborers' Dist. Council v. City of St. Louis, 951 S.W.2d 654 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997). “mains ... which, in the judgment of [MSD’s] Board, will provide an effective and advantageous means for insuring the area within [MSD] of adequate sanitary and storm water drainage and of adequate sanitary disposal and treatment of the sewage thereof .”
Gluck v. Terminal R.R., 702 S.W.2d 476 (Mo. 1986). “Ill, § 3.020(19). We do not believe that either the policy behind the adoption of MSD or any of the ordinances passed thereunder and directed to the trial court’s attention 5 is necessarily inconsistent with § 389.”
Milton Constr. & Supply Co. v. Metro. St. Louis Sewer Dist., 352 S.W.2d 685 (Mo. 1961). “Louis, the existing sanitary and storm sewer systems and facilities of any and all municipalities, sewer districts and other public agencies situated within the boundaries of the said City and County, became subject to the exclusive jurisdiction, control and supervision of the…”
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 3.020(1): 3 cases
Metro. St. Louis Sewer Dist. v. Zykan, 495 S.W.2d 643 (Mo. 1973). “No proof of water pollution necessary to invocation of the District’s power under Section 3.020 of its Charter, and no proof that the District had taken action necessary to exercise control over the creek under Section 3.”
St. Louis Inv. Props., Inc. v. Metro. St. Louis Sewer Dist., 873 S.W.2d 303 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994). “Section 3.020(1). The Plan provides that “[t]he powers of the District shall be exercised in the manner prescribed in this Plan, or, if not prescribed herein, in such manner as may be prescribed by the Board.”
E. Missouri Laborers' Dist. Council v. City of St. Louis, 951 S.W.2d 654 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997). “mains ... which, in the judgment of [MSD’s] Board, will provide an effective and advantageous means for insuring the area within [MSD] of adequate sanitary and storm water drainage and of adequate sanitary disposal and treatment of the sewage thereof .”
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 3.020(13): 1 case
State v. Metro. St. Louis Sewer Dist., 275 S.W.2d 225 (Mo. 1955). “020(6) of the plan; (2) Unlimited borrowing authorized by Section 3.020(13); (3) The bonding of the District, authorized by Section 3.”
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 3.020(14): 1 case
State v. Metro. St. Louis Sewer Dist., 275 S.W.2d 225 (Mo. 1955). “020(6) of the plan; (2) Unlimited borrowing authorized by Section 3.020(13); (3) The bonding of the District, authorized by Section 3.”
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 3.020(15): 2 cases
State v. Metro. St. Louis Sewer Dist., 275 S.W.2d 225 (Mo. 1955). “020(6) of the plan; (2) Unlimited borrowing authorized by Section 3.020(13); (3) The bonding of the District, authorized by Section 3.”
Beatty v. Metro. St. Louis Sewer Dist., 731 S.W.2d 318 (Mo. Ct. App. 1987). “Nothing in the majority opinion will prevent MSD from financing long-range district-wide improvements with revenue bonds. They may do so by submitting district-wide projects to all voters in the district and subdistrict projects to voters within the affected subdistrict.”
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 3.020(15)(f): 1 case
Beatty v. Metro. St. Louis Sewer Dist., 731 S.W.2d 318 (Mo. Ct. App. 1987). “Nothing in the majority opinion will prevent MSD from financing long-range district-wide improvements with revenue bonds. They may do so by submitting district-wide projects to all voters in the district and subdistrict projects to voters within the affected subdistrict.”
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 3.020(16): 2 cases
St. Louis Inv. Props., Inc. v. Metro. St. Louis Sewer Dist., 873 S.W.2d 303 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994). “Section 3.020(1). The Plan provides that “[t]he powers of the District shall be exercised in the manner prescribed in this Plan, or, if not prescribed herein, in such manner as may be prescribed by the Board.”
Missouri Growth Ass'n v. Metro. St. Louis Sewer Dist., 941 S.W.2d 615 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997). “9029, however, a user of non-metered residential property may request the installation of a meter. Furthermore, these two methods of measuring wastewater usage for metered and non-metered customers have both been specifically approved by the voters in MSD’s Charter (Plan),…”
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 3.020(19): 1 case
Gluck v. Terminal R.R., 702 S.W.2d 476 (Mo. 1986). “Ill, § 3.020(19). We do not believe that either the policy behind the adoption of MSD or any of the ordinances passed thereunder and directed to the trial court’s attention 5 is necessarily inconsistent with § 389.”
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 3.020(3): 1 case
Gluck v. Terminal R.R., 702 S.W.2d 476 (Mo. 1986). “Ill, § 3.020(19). We do not believe that either the policy behind the adoption of MSD or any of the ordinances passed thereunder and directed to the trial court’s attention 5 is necessarily inconsistent with § 389.”
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 3.020(6): 1 case
State v. Metro. St. Louis Sewer Dist., 275 S.W.2d 225 (Mo. 1955). “020(6) of the plan; (2) Unlimited borrowing authorized by Section 3.020(13); (3) The bonding of the District, authorized by Section 3.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.