Mo. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 303
Missouri Revised Statutes

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 303.315 (2026)

Copies of suspension orders, constitute evidence

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

  303.315.  Copies of suspension orders, constitute evidence. — Copies of suspension orders entered pursuant to this chapter duly certified by the director of revenue shall be evidence in all courts of this state in actions arising under this chapter.

­­--------

(L. 1955 p. 627 § 303.365)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1968–1985 · leading case: State v. Jackson, 690 S.W.2d 491 (Mo. Ct. App. 1985).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Jackson, 690 S.W.2d 491 (Mo. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 5× “In Cipolla , the court held that a copy of a notice of revocation of defendant’s drivers license was not admissible because it was not certified as required by § 303.315. 2 The court also held that the defendant’s driving record could not be properly part of such a certification.”
State v. Flowers, 597 S.W.2d 276 (Mo. Ct. App. 1980). · cites it 2× “Resolution of the case entailed a construction of § 303.315, RSMo. 1959 which statute provided as follows: Copies of suspension orders entered pursuant to this chapter duly certified by the director of revenue shall be evidence in all courts of this state in actions arising…”
State v. Johnson, 508 S.W.2d 18 (Mo. Ct. App. 1974). · cites it 2× “We find that the order of defendant’s revocation of license was properly certified under § 303.315, RSMo 1969, V.A.M.S. Defendant’s final point of alleged error is the joinder of two felonies and a misdemeanor.”
State v. Cipolla, 435 S.W.2d 52 (Mo. Ct. App. 1968). · cites it 8× “” He also objected on the basis that the exhibit was not certified by the Director of Revenue as provided in Section 303.315; that it was not admissible under the provisions of any other statute; that the typed statement on the form on page 1 of the exhibit that defendant’s…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.