Missouri Revised Statutes

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 320.136 (2026)

Ground salutes, special type, prohibited

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

  320.136.  Ground salutes, special type, prohibited. — Ground salutes commonly known as "cherry bombs", "M-80's", "M-100's", "M-1000's", and any other tubular salutes or any items described as prohibited chemical components or forbidden devices as listed in the American Pyrotechnics Association Standard 87-1 or which exceed the limits set for consumer fireworks, display fireworks, or proximate fireworks for explosive composition are expressly prohibited from shipment into, manufacture, possession, sale, or use within the state of Missouri for consumer use.  Possession, sale, manufacture, or transport of this type of illegal explosive shall be punished as provided by the provisions of section 571.020.

­­--------

(L. 1985 S.B. 76 § 7, A.L. 1987 H.B. 416, A.L. 1999 H.B. 343, A.L. 2004 S.B. 1196, A.L. 2012 H.B. 1647 merged with S.B. 835)

Effective 6-11-12 (S.B. 835); 7-10-12 (H.B. 1647)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1992–1999 · leading case: Shelton v. Farr, 996 S.W.2d 541 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999).
Shelton v. Farr, 996 S.W.2d 541 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “136”; (3) “an immediate declaratory judgment that the State Fire Marshal’s refusal to grant [Shelton’s] request for a fireworks license to be unlawful as contrary to the provisions of § 320.”
Shelton v. Vinyard, 943 S.W.2d 727 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 10× “Section 320.136, RSMo 1994. The devices which Shelton possessed exceeded the amount of explosive content allowed for ground devices.”
State v. Camden, 837 S.W.2d 33 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992). “020, RSMo 1986 1 (now repealed) and possession of an explosive weapon, § 320.136 and § 571.020. Camden also appeals the denial of his Motion to Vacate Judgment and Sentence under Rule 29.”
Camden v. State, 867 S.W.2d 718 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994). “020, RSMo 1986 (now repealed), and for the possession of an explosive weapon, sections 320.136 and 571.020, RSMo 1986. Affirmed.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.