Missouri Revised Statutes

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 353.110 (2026)

Organization of corporation

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

353.030. Organization of corporation — contents of articles of agreement. — 1. Once the requirements of this section have been complied with, the real property of urban redevelopment corporations acquired pursuant to this chapter shall not be subject to assessment or payment of general ad valorem taxes imposed by the cities affected by this law, or by the state or any political subdivision thereof, for a period not in excess of ten years after the date upon which such corporations become owners of such real property, except to such extent and in such amount as may be imposed upon such real property during such period measured solely by the amount of the assessed valuation of the land, exclusive of improvements, acquired pursuant to this chapter and owned by such urban redevelopment corporation, as was determined by the assessor of the county in which such real property is located, or, if not located within a county, then by the assessor of such city, for taxes due and payable thereon during the calendar year preceding the calendar year during which the corporation acquired title to such real property. The amounts of such tax assessments shall not be increased during such period so long as the real property is owned by an urban redevelopment corporation and used in accordance with a development plan authorized by the legislative authority of such cities, except as provided under subsection 4 of this section.

2. In the event, however, that any such real property was tax exempt immediately prior to ownership by any urban redevelopment corporation, such assessor or assessors shall, upon acquisition of title thereto by the urban redevelopment corporation, promptly assess such land, exclusive of improvements, at such valuation as shall conform to but not exceed the assessed valuation made during the preceding calendar year of other land, exclusive of improvements, adjacent thereto or in the same general neighborhood, and the amount of such assessed valuation shall not be increased during the period set pursuant to subsection 1 of this section so long as the real property is owned by an urban redevelopment corporation and used in accordance with a development plan authorized by the legislative authority of such cities. For the next ensuing period not in excess of fifteen years, ad valorem taxes upon such real property shall be measured by the assessed valuation thereof as determined by such assessor or assessors upon the basis of not to exceed fifty percent of the true value of such real property, including any improvements thereon, nor shall such valuations be increased above fifty percent of the true value of such real property from year to year during such next ensuing period so long as the real property is owned by an urban redevelopment corporation and used in accordance with an authorized development plan. After a period totaling not more than twenty-five years, such real property shall be subject to assessment and payment of all ad valorem taxes, based on the full true value of the real property; provided, that after the completion of the redevelopment project, as authorized by law or ordinance whenever any urban redevelopment corporation shall elect to pay full taxes, or at the expiration of the period, such real property shall be owned and operated free from any of the conditions, restrictions or provisions of this chapter, and of any ordinance, rule or regulation adopted pursuant thereto, any other law limiting the right of domestic and foreign insurance companies to own and operate real estate to the contrary notwithstanding.

3. No tax abatement or exemption authorized by this section shall become effective unless and until the governing body of the city:

(1) Furnishes each political subdivision whose boundaries for ad valorem taxation purposes include any portion of the real property to be affected by such tax abatement or exemption with a written statement of the impact on ad valorem taxes such tax abatement or exemption will have on such political subdivisions and written notice of the hearing to be held in accordance with subdivision (2) of this subsection. The written statement and notice required by this subdivision shall be furnished as provided by local ordinance before the hearing and shall include, but need not be limited to, an estimate of the amount of ad valorem tax revenues of each political subdivision which will be affected by the proposed tax abatement or exemption, based on the estimated assessed valuation of the real property involved as such property would exist before and after it is redeveloped;

(2) Conducts a public hearing regarding such tax abatement or exemption, at which hearing all political subdivisions described in subdivision (1) of this subsection shall have the right to be heard on such grant of tax abatement or exemption;

(3) Enacts an ordinance which provides for expiration of development rights, including the rights of eminent domain and tax abatement, in the event of failure of the urban redevelopment corporation to acquire ownership of property within the area of the development plan. Such ordinance shall provide for a duration of time within which such property must be acquired, and may allow for acquisition of property under the plan in phases.

4. (1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, payments in lieu of taxes may be imposed by contract between a city and an urban redevelopment corporation which receives tax abatement or exemption on property pursuant to this section. Such payments shall be made to the collector of revenue of the county or city not within a county by December thirty-first of each year payments are due. The governing body of the city shall furnish the collector a copy of any such contract requiring payment in lieu of taxes. The collector shall allocate all revenues received from such payment in lieu of taxes among all taxing authorities whose property tax revenues are affected by the exemption or abatement on the same pro rata basis and in the same manner as the ad valorem property tax revenues received by each taxing authority from such property in the year such payments are due.

(2) (a) The provisions of subsection 1 of this section and subdivision (1) of this subsection notwithstanding, beginning August 28, 2018, any district or county imposing a property tax for the purposes of providing emergency services under chapter 190 or 321 shall be entitled to be reimbursed in an amount that is at least fifty percent but not more than one hundred percent of the amount of ad valorem property tax revenues that the district or county would have received in the absence of the tax abatement or exemption provided under this section.

(b) An ambulance district board operating under chapter 190, a fire protection district board operating under chapter 321, or the governing body of a county operating a 911 center providing emergency or dispatch services under chapter 190 or ^* 321 shall annually set the reimbursement rate under paragraph (a) of this subdivision prior to the time the assessment is determined by the assessor of the county in which such district is located, or, if not located within a county, then the assessor of such city. If the development plan or redevelopment project is amended by ordinance or by any other means after August 28, 2018, the ambulance or fire protection district board shall have the right to recalculate the reimbursement rate under this subdivision.

5. The provisions of subsection 3 of this section shall not apply to any amendment or future amendment to a phased development plan approved by the governing body of the city prior to the effective date of the provisions of subsection 3 of this section and upon which construction has been in progress pursuant to such phased plan.

--------

(L. 1945 p. 1242 § 10, A.L. 1947 V. I p. 393, A.L. 1986 H.B. 1327, A.L. 2018 S.B. 870)

*Word "chapter" appears here in original rolls.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 11 cases, 1954–1998 · leading case: Bd. of Educ. v. City of St. Louis, 879 S.W.2d 530 (Mo. 1994).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Bd. of Educ. v. City of St. Louis, 879 S.W.2d 530 (Mo. 1994). · cites it 26× “These ordinances also declared that the property subject to the redevelopment plan was "blighted" and, therefore, qualified for a twenty-five year period of tax relief as authorized under § 353.110, RSMo 1959. In April 1992, prior to the expiration of the twenty-five year period…”

Sommer v. City of St. Louis, 631 S.W.2d 676 (Mo. Ct. App. 1982). · cites it 13× “Section 353.110, RSMo 1959, was in effect at that time.”

Annbar Assocs. v. West Side Redevelopment Corp., 397 S.W.2d 635 (Mo. 1965). · cites it 13× “Section 353.110 provides for partial relief from taxation of the real property of such corporations, viz: for the first 10 years it is subject to assessment for general ad valorem taxes solely on the value of the land exclusive of improvements, for the next 15 years such taxes…”

Land Clearance for Redevelopment Auth. of St. Louis v. City of St. Louis, 270 S.W.2d 58 (Mo. 1954). · cites it 6× “Intervenor further contends that since “the land in the project area will be acquired eventually by private interests, Section 353.110, RSMo.1951, which undertakes to grant a tax exemption to a private urban redevelopment corporation on land bought by it from the plaintiff, is…”

Dehner Urban Redevelopment Corp.—St. Louis v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., 567 S.W.2d 700 (Mo. Ct. App. 1978). · cites it 4× “§ 353.110 RSMo 1969. The City of St. Louis, Missouri, by ordinance, adopted the provisions of the statute.”

Schweig v. City of St. Louis, 569 S.W.2d 215 (Mo. Ct. App. 1978). · cites it 2× “The granting of tax incentives to developers, furthermore, is authorized by § 353.110 RSMo.1969. Since plaintiffs’ petition in part does state a cause of action, the trial court’s order dismissing the petition cannot be sustained on this ground.”

Sch. Dist. of Riverview Gardens v. St. Louis Cnty., 816 S.W.2d 219 (Mo. 1991). · cites it 3× “255, RSMo, and section 353.110, RSMo, shall be included in the value of "new construction and improvements" when they become totally or partially subject to assessment and payment of all ad valorem taxes.”

Two Pershing Square, L.P. v. Boley, 981 S.W.2d 635 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998). “In their third point, they claim that the trial court erred in holding that § 353.110, which provides a tax abatement for development projects in blighted areas, expressly prohibited the assessment of the abatement.”

Council Plaza Redevelopment Corp. v. Duffey, 439 S.W.2d 526 (Mo. 1969). · cites it 2× “130 it is given the power of eminent domain, by Section 353.110 it enjoys a ten-year exemption from real property taxation on the improvements made and by Section 353.”

United States v. Certain Parcel of Land in Jackson Cnty., 322 F. Supp. 841 (W.D. Mo. 1971). · cites it 2× “131; and (b) whether the exemption from, or reduction of, general ad valorem taxes on land within such an urban redevelopment project (as provided in Section 353.110, V.A.M.S.) can be considered as a factor in determining said issue of just compensation? 2.”

Thomas W. Garland, Inc. v. City of St. Louis, 492 F. Supp. 402 (E.D. Mo. 1980). “These privileges included long-term tax abatements, § 353.110 R.S.Mo. (1969), and the power of eminent domain.”

— Mo. Rev. Stat. § 353.110(1) — 1 case

Sommer v. City of St. Louis, 631 S.W.2d 676 (Mo. Ct. App. 1982). “Section 353.110, RSMo 1959, was in effect at that time.”

— Mo. Rev. Stat. § 353.110(2) — 2 cases

Sommer v. City of St. Louis, 631 S.W.2d 676 (Mo. Ct. App. 1982). “Section 353.110, RSMo 1959, was in effect at that time.”

Annbar Assocs. v. West Side Redevelopment Corp., 397 S.W.2d 635 (Mo. 1965). “Section 353.110 provides for partial relief from taxation of the real property of such corporations, viz: for the first 10 years it is subject to assessment for general ad valorem taxes solely on the value of the land exclusive of improvements, for the next 15 years such taxes…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.