353.130. Redevelopment corporation may acquire property. — 1. An urban redevelopment corporation may acquire real property or secure options in its own name or, in the name of nominees, it may acquire real property by gift, grant, lease, purchase, or otherwise.
2. An urban redevelopment corporation operating pursuant to a redevelopment agreement with a municipality for a particular redevelopment area, which agreement was executed prior to or on December 31, 2006, shall have the right to acquire by the exercise of the power of eminent domain any real property in such redevelopment area in fee simple or other estate which is necessary to accomplish the purpose of this chapter, under such conditions and only when so empowered by the legislative authority of the cities affected by this chapter.
3. An urban redevelopment corporation operating pursuant to a redevelopment agreement with a municipality for a particular redevelopment area, which agreement was executed prior to or on December 31, 2006, may exercise the power of eminent domain in such redevelopment area in the manner provided for corporations in chapter 523; or it may exercise the power of eminent domain in the manner provided by any other applicable statutory provision for the exercise of the power of eminent domain. Property already devoted to a public use may be acquired in like manner, provided that no real property belonging to any city, county, or the state, or any political subdivision thereof may be acquired without its consent.
Notes of Decisions
66, Inc. v. Crestwood Commons Redevelopment Corp., 998 S.W.2d 32 (Mo. 1999).
· cites it 2× “What is significant about the statutory charter language and the redevelopment corporation statute, section 353.130 (which grants to redevelopment corporations the eminent domain powers of chapter 523) is that these statutory provisions do not exclude the kind of claim made here…”
State ex rel. Terrell v. Nicholls, 719 S.W.2d 862 (Mo. Ct. App. 1986).
· cites it 4× “Its right to exercise the power of eminent domain over relators’ property is derived from § 353.130, RSMo 1978, Chapter 11.06 of the Revised City Code for the City of St.”
McPherson Redevelopment Corp. v. Watkins, 743 S.W.2d 509 (Mo. Ct. App. 1987).
· cites it 4× “McPherson Redevelopment Corporation, plaintiff, has authority to acquire property by eminent domain pursuant to § 353.130 RSMo 1986. Plaintiff filed the action below to condemn two contiguous parcels of land owned by defendants.”
Lafayette Park Baptist Church v. Bd. of Adjustment of St. Louis, 599 S.W.2d 61 (Mo. Ct. App. 1980).
· cites it 2× “For example, the Urban Redevelopment Corporation is authorized to exercise that power in the manner provided for corporations in Chapter 523 by § 353.130, RSMo 1978. In § 227.120, RSMo 1978, the *65 State Highway Commission is authorized to exercise the right of eminent domain…”
Union Ctr. Redevelopment Corp. v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp., 874 F. Supp. 968 (E.D. Mo. 1995).
· cites it 3× “(1986) with the power of eminent domain under § 353.130(3). Section 353.130(3) provides in relevant part that “[pjroperty already devoted to public use may be acquired in like manner, provided that no real property belonging to any city, county, or the state, or any political…”
Cigas v. Kansas City Life Ins. Co., 586 S.W.2d 750 (Mo. Ct. App. 1979).
“No bad faith appears anywhere in the record, nor is there any evidence of any conspiracy between respondent and others (Witthaus as alleged) to bring about blight for respondent’s purposes.”
— Mo. Rev. Stat. § 353.130(2) — 1 case
— Mo. Rev. Stat. § 353.130(3) — 2 cases
State ex rel. Terrell v. Nicholls, 719 S.W.2d 862 (Mo. Ct. App. 1986).
“Its right to exercise the power of eminent domain over relators’ property is derived from § 353.130, RSMo 1978, Chapter 11.06 of the Revised City Code for the City of St.”
Union Ctr. Redevelopment Corp. v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp., 874 F. Supp. 968 (E.D. Mo. 1995).
“(1986) with the power of eminent domain under § 353.130(3). Section 353.130(3) provides in relevant part that “[pjroperty already devoted to public use may be acquired in like manner, provided that no real property belonging to any city, county, or the state, or any political…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.