Missouri Revised Statutes
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 358.300 (2026)
Partnership not terminated by dissolution
✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
358.300. Partnership not terminated by dissolution. — On dissolution the partnership is not terminated but continues until the winding up of partnership affairs is completed.
--------
(L. 1949 p. 506 § 30)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14
cases, 1952–2000 · leading case: Scott v. Edwards Transp. Co., 807 S.W.2d 75 (Mo. 1991).
Scott v. Edwards Transp. Co., 807 S.W.2d 75 (Mo. 1991). “Section 358.300, RSMo 1986. A partnership is "wound up" and its existence terminates when the partnership assets are liquidated and distributed to the partners.”
State Auto. & Cas. Underwriters v. Johnson, 766 S.W.2d 113 (Mo. Ct. App. 1989). “290, RSMo 1986, provides: “The ‘dissolution’ of a partnership is the change in the relation of the partners caused by any partner ceasing to be associated in the carrying on as distinguished from the winding up of the business.”
8182 Maryland Assocs. v. Sheehan, 14 S.W.3d 576 (Mo. 2000). “" Section 358.300; see also Schoeller v. Schoeller, 465 S.”
Centerre Bank of Kansas City Nat'l Ass'n v. Angle, 976 S.W.2d 608 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998). “Angle argues that the record clearly indicates he withdrew from the partnership by October 1986.”
Prange v. Prange, 755 S.W.2d 581 (Mo. Ct. App. 1988). “420 provides for interest to a retiring partner or the representative of a deceased partner where the business is continued following dissolution without settlement of the partnership accounts. Upon dissolution of a partnership, the partnership is not terminated but continues…”
Ohlendorf v. Feinstein, 636 S.W.2d 687 (Mo. Ct. App. 1982). “§ 358.300 RSMo (1969). The partners who have not wrongfully dissolved the partnership have the right to wind up the partnership business.”
Meyer v. Lofgren, 949 S.W.2d 80 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997). “In any event, the change to the corporate form without issuing shares to Meyer to reflect her partnership interest was an act of expulsion which would dissolve the partnership, just as the subsequent “lockout” of Meyer was an act of expulsion.”
Heath v. Spitzmiller, 663 S.W.2d 351 (Mo. Ct. App. 1983). “He is correct that upon dissolution a partnership is not terminated but continues until the winding up of partnership affairs is completed, § 358.300, RSMo 1978; Schoeller v. Schoeller, 465 S.”
Schoeller v. Schoeller, 465 S.W.2d 648 (Mo. Ct. App. 1971). “” Section 358.300 provides: “On dissolution the partnership is not terminated but continues until the winding up of partnership affairs is completed.”
Veatch v. Black, 250 S.W.2d 501 (Mo. 1952). “2d 968, 971 [3-6]; § 358.300, RSMo 1949. A surviving partner succeeds to the rights of a deceased partner in the partnership assets for the purpose of winding up the partnership business.”
Stein v. Jung, 492 S.W.2d 139 (Mo. Ct. App. 1973). “§ 358.300 provides that on dissolution a partnership is not terminated but continued until the winding up of the partnership affairs is completed.”
Turner v. Kaplan, 602 S.W.2d 460 (Mo. Ct. App. 1980). “§ 358.300 RSMo (1978). After dissolution a retiring partner has an election.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.