Missouri Revised Statutes

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 358.300 (2026)

Partnership not terminated by dissolution

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

  358.300.  Partnership not terminated by dissolution. — On dissolution the partnership is not terminated but continues until the winding up of partnership affairs is completed.

­­--------

(L. 1949 p. 506 § 30)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases, 1952–2000 · leading case: Scott v. Edwards Transp. Co., 807 S.W.2d 75 (Mo. 1991).
Scott v. Edwards Transp. Co., 807 S.W.2d 75 (Mo. 1991). · cites it 6× “Section 358.300, RSMo 1986. A partnership is "wound up" and its existence terminates when the partnership assets are liquidated and distributed to the partners.”
State Auto. & Cas. Underwriters v. Johnson, 766 S.W.2d 113 (Mo. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 4× “290, RSMo 1986, provides: “The ‘dissolution’ of a partnership is the change in the relation of the partners caused by any partner ceasing to be associated in the carrying on as distinguished from the winding up of the business.”
8182 Maryland Assocs. v. Sheehan, 14 S.W.3d 576 (Mo. 2000). · cites it 2× “" Section 358.300; see also Schoeller v. Schoeller, 465 S.”
Centerre Bank of Kansas City Nat'l Ass'n v. Angle, 976 S.W.2d 608 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “Angle argues that the record clearly indicates he withdrew from the partnership by October 1986.”
Prange v. Prange, 755 S.W.2d 581 (Mo. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 2× “420 provides for interest to a retiring partner or the representative of a deceased partner where the business is continued following dissolution without settlement of the partnership accounts. Upon dissolution of a partnership, the partnership is not terminated but continues…”
Ohlendorf v. Feinstein, 636 S.W.2d 687 (Mo. Ct. App. 1982). · cites it 2× “§ 358.300 RSMo (1969). The partners who have not wrongfully dissolved the partnership have the right to wind up the partnership business.”
Meyer v. Lofgren, 949 S.W.2d 80 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “In any event, the change to the corporate form without issuing shares to Meyer to reflect her partnership interest was an act of expulsion which would dissolve the partnership, just as the subsequent “lockout” of Meyer was an act of expulsion.”
Heath v. Spitzmiller, 663 S.W.2d 351 (Mo. Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 2× “He is correct that upon dissolution a partnership is not terminated but continues until the winding up of partnership affairs is completed, § 358.300, RSMo 1978; Schoeller v. Schoeller, 465 S.”
Schoeller v. Schoeller, 465 S.W.2d 648 (Mo. Ct. App. 1971). · cites it 4× “” Section 358.300 provides: “On dissolution the partnership is not terminated but continues until the winding up of partnership affairs is completed.”
Veatch v. Black, 250 S.W.2d 501 (Mo. 1952). · cites it 2× “2d 968, 971 [3-6]; § 358.300, RSMo 1949. A surviving partner succeeds to the rights of a deceased partner in the partnership assets for the purpose of winding up the partnership business.”
Stein v. Jung, 492 S.W.2d 139 (Mo. Ct. App. 1973). · cites it 2× “§ 358.300 provides that on dissolution a partnership is not terminated but continued until the winding up of the partnership affairs is completed.”
Turner v. Kaplan, 602 S.W.2d 460 (Mo. Ct. App. 1980). · cites it 2× “§ 358.300 RSMo (1978). After dissolution a retiring partner has an election.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.