Mo. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 407
Missouri Revised Statutes

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 407.050 (2026)

Evidence, when and where produced

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

  407.050.  Evidence, when and where produced. — Documentary material, information, or physical evidence demanded pursuant to the provisions of sections 407.010 to 407.130 shall be produced during normal business hours at the principal office or place of business of the person served, or at such other times and places as may be agreed upon by the person served and the attorney general.

­­--------

(L. 1967 p. 607 § 5, A.L. 1973 H.B. 55)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1973–1989 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Danforth v. Indep. Dodge, Inc., 494 S.W.2d 362 (Mo. Ct. App. 1973).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State Ex Rel. Danforth v. Indep. Dodge, Inc., 494 S.W.2d 362 (Mo. Ct. App. 1973). · cites it 6× “Such notice shall state generally the relief sought and be served in accordance with section 407.050 at least three days prior to the institution of such action.”
State Ex Rel. Webster v. Myers, 779 S.W.2d 286 (Mo. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 2× “The notice shall state generally the relief sought and be served in accordance with section 407.050 at least three days prior to the institution of such action.”
State ex rel. Danforth v. Eur. Health Spa, Inc., 611 S.W.2d 259 (Mo. Ct. App. 1980). · cites it 2× “The notice shall state generally the relief sought and be served in accordance with section 407.050 at least three days prior to the institution of such action.”
State ex rel. Ashcroft v. Goldberg, 608 S.W.2d 385 (Mo. 1980). “Second, appellant asserts that the CID is void on its face by calling for production of documents and materials at respondent’s office contrary to § 407.050, which says that material requested “shall be produced during normal business hours at the principal office or place of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.