Mo. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 407
Missouri Revised Statutes

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 407.1098 (2026)

Telephone solicitation of member on no-call list prohibited

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

  407.1098.  Telephone solicitation of member on no-call list prohibited. — No person or entity shall make or cause to be made any telephone solicitation to any residential subscriber in this state who has given notice to the attorney general, in accordance with rules promulgated pursuant to section 407.1101 of such subscriber's objection to receiving telephone solicitations.

­­--------

(L. 2000 S.B. 763, A.L. 2012 H.B. 1549)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2020–2025 · leading case: Koeller v. Seemplicity Sec. Inc., No. 4:24-cv-00528 (E.D. Mo. Nov. 12, 2024).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Koeller v. Seemplicity Sec. Inc., No. 4:24-cv-00528 (E.D. Mo. Nov. 12, 2024). · cites it 15× “” Mo. Rev. Stat. § 407.1098 . Similar to above, Koeller did not plead any facts showing that Seemplicity knew that it was calling someone who had listed his phone on the Missouri do-not-call registry.”
Thompson v. Vintage Stock, Inc., No. 4:23-cv-00042 (E.D. Mo. Feb. 8, 2024). · cites it 3× “In count three, the Thompsons allege that Vintage Stock violated Missouri’s no-call-list statute, Missouri Revised Statute § 407.1098. The Thompsons seek statutory damages of $5,000 per text message.”
Margulis v. HomeAdvisor, Inc., No. 4:19-cv-00226 (E.D. Mo. Jan. 31, 2020). · cites it 2× “or unidentified individuals acting on HomeAdvisor’s behalf. After HomeAdvisor removed this case to federal court, Plaintiffs amended their Complaint to add class action allegations.”
Margulis v. HomeAdvisor, Inc., No. 4:19-cv-00226, 2020 WL 4673783 (E.D. Mo. Aug. 12, 2020). · cites it 2× “§ 227 (TCPA) and Missouri’s No-Call Law, Mo. Rev. Stat. § 407.1098 . The following facts are uncontroverted for purposes of HomeAdvisor’s Motion: A.”
Kyle v. Charter Commc'ns, Inc., No. 4:20-cv-00062 (W.D. Mo. Apr. 27, 2020). · cites it 2× “Plaintiff also seeks to represent a class of Missouri residents who received calls allegedly in violation of the Missouri Telemarketing No- Call List Law, Mo. Rev. Stat. § 407.1098 . Defendant moves to dismiss or stay this action pursuant to the “first-to-file” rule in…”
Margulis v. Resort Cancellation Servs., LLC, No. 4:25-cv-00945 (E.D. Mo. Oct. 2, 2025). · cites it 2× “1104, by placing several unsolicited calls to Margulis’s residential telephone despite that telephone number being placed on the national and state Do Not Call Lists.1 For the reasons that follow, I will grant defendants Resort Cancellation and Newman’s motion to dismiss…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.