435.440. Appeals. — 1. An appeal may be taken from:
(1) An order denying an application to compel arbitration made under section 435.355;
(2) An order granting an application to stay arbitration made under subsection 2 of section 435.355;
(3) An order confirming or denying confirmation of an award;
(4) An order modifying or correcting an award;
(5) An order vacating an award without directing a rehearing; or
(6) A judgment or decree entered pursuant to the provisions of sections 435.350 to 435.470.
2. The appeal shall be taken in the manner and to the same extent as from orders or judgments in a civil action.
Notes of Decisions
Crack Team USA, Inc. v. Am. Arbitration Ass'n, 128 S.W.3d 580 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).
· cites it 9× “Section 435.440 specifically governs the appealability of arbitration awards; and therefore, we apply that statute to the instant case.”
Korte Constr. Co. v. Deaconess Manor Ass'n, 927 S.W.2d 395 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).
· cites it 12× “DMA argues that because RSMO § 435.440 (1994), a statute authorizing appeals from trial court rulings concerning arbitrations, does not authorize appeal of a trial court order denying a stay of arbitration, there can be no appeal of the trial court ruling in this case.”
Hershewe v. Alexander, 264 S.W.3d 717 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
· cites it 10× “020 generally grants parties the right to appeal from any final judgment in the case, this case involves an appeal in which there is a specific statute, section 435.440, granting an appeal from an order denying an application to compel arbitration.”
Nat'l Avenue Bldg. Co. v. Stewart, 910 S.W.2d 334 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).
· cites it 6× “MUAA has its own section governing appeals, § 435.440. Insofar as pertinent here, § 435.”
Kagan v. Master Home Prods. Ltd., 193 S.W.3d 401 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).
· cites it 6× “Consequently, the court found the motion to dismiss was in substance a motion to compel, which was appealable pursuant to Section 435.440. Id. Section 435.440 provides that an appeal may be taken from an order denying an application to compel arbitration.”
VCW, Inc. v. Mut. Risk Mgmt., Ltd., 46 S.W.3d 118 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001).
· cites it 8× “Respondents’ Motion to Dismiss Before we address the merits of the appellants’ claim of error, we first must address the respondents’ motion to dismiss, which was taken with the case and in which they allege that the trial court’s order denying their motion to stay is not an…”
— Mo. Rev. Stat. § 435.440(1) — 2 cases
Korte Constr. Co. v. Deaconess Manor Ass'n, 927 S.W.2d 395 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).
“DMA argues that because RSMO § 435.440 (1994), a statute authorizing appeals from trial court rulings concerning arbitrations, does not authorize appeal of a trial court order denying a stay of arbitration, there can be no appeal of the trial court ruling in this case.”
— Mo. Rev. Stat. § 435.440(2) — 4 cases
Korte Constr. Co. v. Deaconess Manor Ass'n, 927 S.W.2d 395 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).
“DMA argues that because RSMO § 435.440 (1994), a statute authorizing appeals from trial court rulings concerning arbitrations, does not authorize appeal of a trial court order denying a stay of arbitration, there can be no appeal of the trial court ruling in this case.”
— Mo. Rev. Stat. § 435.440(3) — 1 case
— Mo. Rev. Stat. § 435.440(5) — 1 case
— Mo. Rev. Stat. § 435.440(6) — 2 cases
Korte Constr. Co. v. Deaconess Manor Ass'n, 927 S.W.2d 395 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).
“DMA argues that because RSMO § 435.440 (1994), a statute authorizing appeals from trial court rulings concerning arbitrations, does not authorize appeal of a trial court order denying a stay of arbitration, there can be no appeal of the trial court ruling in this case.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.