Missouri Revised Statutes
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 509.130 (2026)
Adoption of statements by reference
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
509.130. Adoption of statements by reference — exhibits. — Statements in a pleading may be adopted by reference in a different part of the same pleading or in another pleading or in any motion. An exhibit to a pleading is a part thereof for all purposes.
--------
(L. 1943 p. 353 § 44)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16
cases, 1951–2019 · leading case: Crouch v. Tourtelot, 350 S.W.2d 799 (Mo. 1961).
Crouch v. Tourtelot, 350 S.W.2d 799 (Mo. 1961). “The plaintiff alleged six grounds of specific primary negligence on the part of Brown, including excessive speed, failure to maintain a vigilant lookout, failure to keep his car under control, failure to keep his car as near as practicable to the right hand edge, failure to…”
Richard Brewer v. David B. Cosgrove & Cosgrove Law Grp., LLC v. Denise Lunsford, Respondent/Cross-Appellant., 498 S.W.3d 837 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016). “Section 509.130; Rule 55.12. A settlement agreement is governed by contract law.”
Bride v. City of Slater, 263 S.W.2d 22 (Mo. 1953). “Howard, had authority to accept plaintiff’s offer or bid, that is, that the contract thus completed was entered into pursuant to lawful authority on the part of defendant municipality.”
Beets v. Tyler, 290 S.W.2d 76 (Mo. 1956). “Under Section 509.130, RSMo 1949, V.A.M.S., such exhibits are a part of the petition for all purposes and may be considered in passing upon the sufficiency thereof.”
Barnhart v. Ripka, 297 S.W.2d 787 (Mo. Ct. App. 1956). “For, the purported copies of the Ripka and Pendleton deeds, which were attached to and became a part of plaintiffs’ petition [Section 509.130, RSMo 1949, V.Á. M.S.], did not prove themselves; 7 and, although the record of the Ripka deed was identified as an exhibit and…”
M. F. A. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Hill, 320 S.W.2d 559 (Mo. 1959). “Hill and Barney Malone pending against the administratrix in each of which those plaintiffs have alleged that they were riding as guests and that Loran Radabaugh, the owner of the automobile and the “named insured” in the policy, was the driver of the automobile at the time of…”
Jenkins v. Thompson, 251 S.W.2d 325 (Mo. 1952). “Plaintiff pleaded he had been an *326 employee of defendant for twenty-eight years and, since May 1, 1924, in the capacity of a conductor under a written "Schedule of Wages, Conductors" (attached to the petition as Exhibit 1 and incorporated therein by referencesection 509.130…”
Barton v. Farmers Ins. Exch., 255 S.W.2d 451 (Mo. Ct. App. 1953). “At the time the first petition was filed in this cause, the defendant had neither repaired the automobile nor offered the amount it would cost to repair it, in cash, nor paid for *456 the damage.”
McLendon v. Leighty, 320 S.W.2d 735 (Mo. Ct. App. 1959). “Section 509.130 RSMo 1949, V.A. M.S.; Corbin v.”
Ingle v. City of Fulton, 268 S.W.2d 600 (Mo. Ct. App. 1954). “Section 509.130 RSMo 1949, V.A.M.S. The lease attached to the petition, dated May 9, 1949, granted and let to the plain *602 tiffs Pierson the tract of land in question for a period during which “ * * * semi flint and/or other fire clay of suitable quality is found in profitable…”
Corbin v. Hume-Sinclair Coal Mining Co., 237 S.W.2d 81 (Mo. 1951). “” He further alleged that he had notified respondent of his desire to repurchase the land; had tendered to respondent the agreed repurchase price of $2,500; had requested a conveyance to him of this land but respondent refused to accept the tender and to execute a deed conveying…”
State Ex Rel. Kopper Kettle Restaurants, Inc. v. City of St. Robert, 424 S.W.2d 73 (Mo. Ct. App. 1968). “14; § 509.130; Crouch v. Tourtelot, Mo. (banc), 350 S.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.