Mo. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 525
Missouri Revised Statutes

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 525.090 (2026)

Claimants may interplead

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

  525.090.  Claimants may interplead. — Any person claiming property, money, effects or credits attached in the hands of a garnishee, may interplead in the cause, as provided by law in attachment cases; but no judgment shall be rendered against the garnishee in whose hands the same may be, until the interplea shall be determined.

­­--------

(RSMo 1939 § 1568)

Prior revisions: 1929 § 1404; 1919 § 1854; 1909 § 2421

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 1953–2019 · leading case: BMO Harris Bank v. Hawes Trust Investments, LLC, 492 S.W.3d 607 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
BMO Harris Bank v. Hawes Trust Investments, LLC, 492 S.W.3d 607 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 15× “12(a)(1) Hawes Trust argues that section 525.090 and section 525.270 confer on it an unconditional right' to intervene in the Registered Judgment action.”
Moxness v. Hart, 131 S.W.3d 441 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 10× “]” Here, there is such a statute, Section 525.090, which states, “Any person claiming property, money, effects, or credits attached in the hands of a garnishee, may interplead in the cause, as provided by law in attachment cases .”
Harrison v. Harrison, 339 S.W.2d 509 (Mo. Ct. App. 1960). · cites it 3× “Intervention in a garnishment by an inter-pleader claiming the property seized is specifically provided for in the chapter on-garnishments, Section 525.090 RSMo 1949, V.A.M.S.; and in such a proceedings the sole issue is the ownership and right of the interpleader to the…”
Farrington v. O'Reilly Auto. Inc. (In Re TMIC Indus. Cleaning Co.), 19 B.R. 397 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 1982). · cites it 2× “” State ex rel Mather supra at 282. The fact that other parties may in-terplead to claim the fund garnished does not alter the substantive law.”
Martin v. Signal Dodge, Inc., 444 S.W.2d 29 (Mo. Ct. App. 1969). · cites it 3× “, same as Section 525.090 RSMo 1959, V.A. M.S., to assert its right to the bank account.”
Harrison v. Harrison, 417 S.W.2d 39 (Mo. Ct. App. 1967). · cites it 3× “Section 525.090, RSMo 1949, V.A.M.S. See Baden Bank of St.”
Kearney Com. Bank v. Deiter, 407 S.W.2d 575 (Mo. Ct. App. 1966). · cites it 2× “1939 (present Section 525.090 V.A.M.S.), which provided that “Any person claiming property, money, effects or credits attached in the hands of a garnishee, may interplead in the cause, as provided by law in attachment cases; but no judgment shall be rendered against the…”
KCAF Investors, L.L.C. v. Kansas City Downtown Streetcar Transp. Dev. Dist., 414 S.W.3d 470 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013). “2004) (interpreting § 525.090, which states that “[a]ny person claiming property .”
Clarkin v. Worthley, 114 F. Supp. 877 (W.D. Mo. 1953). · cites it 2× “Note this language, Section 525.090: “Any person claiming property, money, effects or credits attached in the hands of a garnishee, may inter-plead in the cause, as provided by law in attachment cases; but no judgment shall be rendered against the garnishee in whose hands the…”
Aly v. Hanzada for Imp. & Exp. Co., LTD, No. 5:12-cv-06069 (W.D. Mo. June 10, 2019). · cites it 2× “See Mo. Rev. Stat. § 525.090 (“Any person claiming money, effects or credits in the hands of a garnishee, may interplead in the cause .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.