Mo. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 537
Missouri Revised Statutes

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 537.200 (2026)

Vice-principals defined

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

  537.200.  Vice-principals defined. — All persons engaged in the service of any railroad corporation doing business in this state or of any person, company or corporation operating a mine or mines in this state, who are entrusted by such railroad corporation, person, company or corporation, with the authority of superintendence, control or command of other persons in the employ or service of such railroad corporation, person, company or corporation, or with authority to direct any other servant in the performance of any duty of such servant, or with the duty of inspection or other duty owing by the master to the servant, are "vice-principals" of such corporation, and are not fellow servants with such employees.

­­--------

(RSMo 1939 §§ 3666, 3673, A. 1949 H.B. 2135)

Prior revisions: 1929 §§ 3276, 3283; 1919 §§ 4227, 4234; 1909 §§ 5435, 5441

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1998–1998 · leading case: Martin v. Missouri High. & Transp. Dep't, 981 S.W.2d 577 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Martin v. Missouri High. & Transp. Dep't, 981 S.W.2d 577 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998). “9 Martin presented sufficient evidence on all elements necessary to establish a dangerous condition under § 537.200(2). Finally, MHTC argues that the trial court did not err in granting JNOV because *585 it established that it was entitled to the state of the art defense in §…”
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 537.200(2): 1 case
Martin v. Missouri High. & Transp. Dep't, 981 S.W.2d 577 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998). “9 Martin presented sufficient evidence on all elements necessary to establish a dangerous condition under § 537.200(2). Finally, MHTC argues that the trial court did not err in granting JNOV because *585 it established that it was entitled to the state of the art defense in §…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.